06 February 2018 : Original article
Challenges with Intestine and Multivisceral Re-Transplantation: Importance of Timing of Re-Transplantation and Optimal Immunosuppression
Chandrashekhar A. Kubal1ACDEF*, Catherine Pennington2BCDE, Jonathan Fridell1E, Burcin Ekser1DE, Plamen Mihaylov1DE, Richard Mangus1BCDEFDOI: 10.12659/AOT.908052
Ann Transplant 2018; 23:98-104
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing re-transplantation often receive high doses of immunosuppression, which may lead to an immunocompromised status of the recipient. This study investigates the outcomes after intestine/multivisceral re-transplantation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes of 23 patients undergoing 24 re-transplantations at a single intestine transplant center were reviewed. Bone marrow suppression was used as a surrogate marker of immunocompromised status, and was defined as platelet count <50 k/mm3 and absolute lymphocyte count <200/mm³.
RESULTS: All re-transplants except one were liver inclusive. Fifteen of 23 patients died at a median time of 12 months (range 0.2–75) after re-transplantation. Of the 15 deaths, nine (60%) resulted from complications associated with a compromised host immune status: graft versus host disease (GVHD) affecting bone marrow (three cases), persistent viral infection (three cases), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD (one case), metastatic cancer (one case), multi-drug resistant polymicrobial sepsis (one case). Four deaths (27%) resulted from severe rejection. Non-survivors were more likely to have received alemtuzumab, and had higher incidence of bone marrow suppression. In addition to immunocompromised status and rejection, the use of alemtuzumab was associated with mortality after intestinal/multivisceral re-transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: High mortality was associated with intestine/multivisceral re-transplantation. To improve clinical outcomes of intestine and multivisceral transplantation, it is important to allow reconstitution of host immunity. Longer interval between the two transplantations, and strategies such as allograft specific immunosuppression, may spare the host from the devastating effects of potent immunosuppression currently used.
Keywords: Graft Rejection, Graft vs Host Disease, Immunocompromised Host, Intestine, Small, Transplantation
In Press
Original article
A New Routine Immunity Score (RIS2020) to Predict Severe Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant RecipientsAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.946233
Original article
Survival Analysis of Liver Transplants in Patients with Acute Liver Failure from Acetaminophen and Mushroom...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.946485
Original article
Medication Adherence Among Pediatric Post-Heart Transplant Patients in a Tertiary Care HospitalAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.946905
Most Viewed Current Articles
03 Jan 2023 : Original article 6,368
Impact of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in First-Line and...DOI :10.12659/AOT.938467
Ann Transplant 2023; 28:e938467
16 May 2023 : Original article 6,030
Breaking Antimicrobial Resistance: High-Dose Amoxicillin with Clavulanic Acid for Urinary Tract Infections ...DOI :10.12659/AOT.939258
Ann Transplant 2023; 28:e939258
15 Aug 2023 : Review article 5,906
Free-Circulating Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers in Patients After Solid Organ TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.939750
Ann Transplant 2023; 28:e939750
17 Jan 2023 : Original article 5,150
Non-Cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Graft for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation i...DOI :10.12659/AOT.938595
Ann Transplant 2023; 28:e938595