01 April 2025 : Original article
Optimizing Tacrolimus Dosing During Hospitalization After Kidney Transplantation: A Comparative Model Analysis
Sangkyun MokDOI: 10.12659/AOT.947768
Ann Transplant 2025; 30:e947768
Table 8 Tacrolimus dose prediction performance metrics.
| Model | Split | R2 | MAE | MAPE | MSE | RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XGBoost | 0 | 0.857 | 0.727 | 0.2 | 1.12 | 1.058 |
| 1 | 0.856 | 0.657 | 0.186 | 0.88 | 0.938 | |
| 2 | 0.905 | 0.543 | 0.124 | 0.515 | 0.718 | |
| 3 | 0.842 | 0.634 | 0.14 | 0.729 | 0.854 | |
| 4 | 0.802 | 0.729 | 0.148 | 1.528 | 1.236 | |
| Average (Split=5) (mean±SD) | 0.852±0.037 | 0.658±0.077 | 0.160±0.032 | 0.954±0.389 | 0.961±0.198 | |
| Linear regression | 0 | 0.869 | 0.706 | 0.186 | 1.028 | 1.014 |
| 1 | 0.862 | 0.606 | 0.143 | 0.842 | 0.917 | |
| 2 | 0.922 | 0.472 | 0.107 | 0.425 | 0.652 | |
| 3 | 0.848 | 0.597 | 0.131 | 0.704 | 0.839 | |
| 4 | 0.8 | 0.726 | 0.152 | 1.54 | 1.241 | |
| Average (Split=5) (mean±SD) | 0.860±0.044 | 0.621±0.102 | 0.144±0.029 | 0.908±0.416 | 0.933±0.218 | |
| Elastic net regression | 0 | 0.869 | 0.702 | 0.186 | 1.025 | 1.012 |
| 1 | 0.863 | 0.607 | 0.138 | 0.837 | 0.915 | |
| 2 | 0.923 | 0.473 | 0.107 | 0.416 | 0.645 | |
| 3 | 0.849 | 0.595 | 0.131 | 0.698 | 0.835 | |
| 4 | 0.8 | 0.731 | 0.151 | 1.539 | 1.241 | |
| Average (Split=5) (mean±SD) | 0.861±0.044 | 0.622±0.102 | 0.143±0.029 | 0.903±0.419 | 0.930±0.220 | |
| R – coefficient of determination; MAE – mean absolute error; MAPE – mean absolute percentage error; MSE – mean squared error; RMSE – root mean square error. | ||||||






