01 April 2025 : Original article
Optimizing Tacrolimus Dosing During Hospitalization After Kidney Transplantation: A Comparative Model Analysis
Sangkyun MokDOI: 10.12659/AOT.947768
Ann Transplant 2025; 30:e947768
Table 9 Tacrolimus trough level prediction performance metrics.
| Model | Split | R2 | MAE | MAPE | MSE | RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XGBoost | 0 | 0.136 | 1.659 | 0.199 | 6.593 | 2.568 |
| 1 | 0.371 | 1.622 | 0.222 | 4.326 | 2.08 | |
| 2 | 0.237 | 1.382 | 0.176 | 3.575 | 1.891 | |
| 3 | 0.267 | 1.789 | 0.251 | 4.93 | 2.22 | |
| 4 | 0.309 | 1.786 | 0.215 | 6.142 | 2.478 | |
| Average (Split=5) (mean±SD) | 0.264±0.087 | 1.648±0.166 | 0.213±0.028 | 5.113±1.252 | 2.247±0.279 | |
| Linear regression | 0 | 0.058 | 1.706 | 0.198 | 7.187 | 2.681 |
| 1 | 0.379 | 1.621 | 0.224 | 4.269 | 2.066 | |
| 2 | 0.27 | 1.377 | 0.174 | 3.417 | 1.849 | |
| 3 | 0.367 | 1.601 | 0.227 | 4.257 | 2.063 | |
| 4 | 0.276 | 1.808 | 0.215 | 6.431 | 2.536 | |
| Average (Split=5) (mean±SD) | 0.270±0.129 | 1.623±0.160 | 0.208±0.022 | 5.112±1.610 | 2.239±0.352 | |
| Elastic net regression | 0 | 0.082 | 1.676 | 0.194 | 6.998 | 2.645 |
| 1 | 0.387 | 1.61 | 0.223 | 4.213 | 2.053 | |
| 2 | 0.281 | 1.368 | 0.174 | 3.367 | 1.835 | |
| 3 | 0.372 | 1.604 | 0.228 | 4.222 | 2.055 | |
| 4 | 0.267 | 1.822 | 0.217 | 6.508 | 2.551 | |
| Average (Split=5) (mean±SD) | 0.278±0.122 | 1.616±0.164 | 0.207±0.023 | 5.062±1.592 | 2.228±0.351 | |
| R – coefficient of determination; MAE – mean absolute error; MAPE – mean absolute percentage error; MSE – mean squared error; RMSE – root mean square error. | ||||||






