19 July 2022>: Original Paper
Graft Inflow Modulation in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Hepatic Hemodynamic Changes in Splenic Artery Ligation and Splenectomy
Che-Min Su ABCDEF , Tsung-Ching Chou ABD , Tsung-Han Yang ABD , Yih-Jyh Lin ABDEF*DOI: 10.12659/AOT.936609
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e936609
Table 3 Clinical characteristics of all recipients and donors in the modulation group.
VariablesModulation | Subgroup 1SAL | Subgroup 2Slenectomy | P |
---|---|---|---|
N | 17 | 19 | |
Recipient | |||
Age, years | 58 (52–64) | 54 (49–63) | 0.253 |
Sex (M), n (%) | 14 (82.4) | 9 (47.4) | 0.029 |
BMI, kg/m | 24.9 (23.4–26.1) | 25.4 (22.9–31.2) | 0.428 |
Hepatitis profile | 0.180 | ||
HBV+/HCV+ | 0 | 2 (10.5) | |
HBV+ | 10 (58.8) | 5 (26.3) | |
HCV+ | 3 (17.6) | 5 (26.3) | |
Negative | 4 (23.5) | 7 (36.8) | |
Disease indication, n (%) | 0.124 | ||
Acute/acute on chronic liver failure | 3 (17.6) | 1 (5.3) | |
Decompensated cirrhosis | 6 (35.3) | 13 (68.4) | |
Hepatocellular carcinoma | 8 (47.1) | 5 (26.3) | |
MELD | 15 (10–24) | 14 (12–19) | 0.799 |
MELD ≥25, n (%) | 4 (23.5) | 3 (17.6) | 0.858 |
ABO incompatible, n (%) | 4 (21.1) | 4 (21.1) | 0.797 |
Donor | |||
Donor age, y | 26 (23–33) | 33 (23–37) | 0.136 |
Donor age ≥40, n (%) | 0 | 5 (26.3) | 0.023 |
Sex (M), n (%) | 11 (64.7) | 5 (26.3) | 0.021 |
BMI, kg/m | 20.4 (18.4–23.7) | 23.2 (21.2–23.6) | 0.090 |
Liver graft | |||
Actual GRWR (%) | 0.99 (0.84–1.12) | 0.83 (0.71–0.99) | 0.038 |
GRWR | 2 (11.8) | 9 (47.4) | 0.021 |
Graft weight, g | 658 (575–782) | 577 (452–682) | 0.022 |
Graft type, n (%) | 0.74 | ||
Right lobe | 17 (100) | 14 (73.7) | |
Left lobe | 0 | 4 (21.1) | |
Right lobe with MHV | 0 | 0 | |
Right posterior section | 0 | 1 (5.3) | |
SAL – splenic artery ligation; BMI – body mass index; HBV – hepatitis B virus; HCV – hepatitis C virus; MELD – model of end-stage liver disease; GRWR – graft-to-recipient weight ratio. Continuous variables are expressed as median (IQR). Categorical variables are expressed as number of patients (percentage). |