20 February 2024>: Original Paper
Lymphocele Outcomes After Renal Transplantations Performed by an Experienced Surgeon: Is Meticulously Performed Surgery and Experience Adequate to Prevent Lymphocele?
Nurettin Ay 1ABCDEF* , Vahhac Alp 1B , Recai Duymuş 2BD , Sedat Çetin 3BDDOI: 10.12659/AOT.942656
Ann Transplant 2024; 29:e942656
Table 2 Patient, surgical, preoperative, and postoperative variables.
Characteristic | All patients n=315 | Nonlymphocele group 233 (74%) | Lymphocele group 82 (26%) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.97 | ||||
Under 18.4 | 4 (1.2%) | 3 (1.3%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
18.5–24.9 | 217 (68.9%) | 159 (68.2%) | 58 (70.7%) | |
25–29.9 | 56 (17.8%) | 43 (18.5%) | 13 (15.9%) | |
30–34.9 | 33 (10.5%) | 25 (10.7%) | 8 (9.8%) | |
35–39.9 | 4 (1.2%) | 3 (1.3%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
Over 40 | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | |
0.123 | ||||
Basiliximab | 67 (21.3%) | 54 (23.2%) | 13 (15.9%) | |
ATG | 232 (73.7%) | 170 (73%) | 62 (75.6%) | |
No induction | 16 (5.1%) | 9 (3.9%) | 7 (8.5%) | |
0.315 | ||||
TAC+MMF+PRED | 302 (95.9%) | 223 (95.7%) | 79 (96.3%) | |
CS+MMF+PRED | 5 (1.6%) | 5 (2.1%) | 0 | |
EVE+TAC+PRED | 8 (2.3%) | 5 (2.1%) | 3 (3.7%) | |
4 (1.3%) | 4 (1.7) | 0 | 0.576 | |
0.239 | ||||
0 MM | 33 (10.5%) | 19 (8.2%) | 14 (17.1%) | |
1 MM | 8 (2.5%) | 6 (2.6%) | 2 (2.4%) | |
2 MM | 49 (15.6%) | 34 (14.6%) | 15 (18.3%) | |
3 MM | 109 (34.6%) | 81 (34.8%) | 28 (34.1%) | |
4 MM | 30 (9.5%) | 25 (10.7%) | 5 (6.1%) | |
5 MM | 53 (16.8%) | 43 (18.5%) | 10 (12.2%) | |
6 MM | 33 (10.5%) | 25 (10.7%) | 8 (9.8%) | |
1.27±0.86 | 1.27±0.94 | 1.26±0.61 | 0.85 | |
28 (8.9%) | 20 (8.6%) | 8 (9.8%) | 0.75 | |
BMI – body mass index; ATG – anti-thymocyte globulin; TAC – tacrolimus; MMF – mycophenolate mofetil; PRED – prednisolone; CS – cyclosporine; EVE – everolimus; DGF – delayed graft function. |