12 March 2024>: Original Paper
Use of LCP-Tacrolimus (LCPT) in Kidney Transplantation: A Delphi Consensus Survey of Expert Clinicians
Alexander Wiseman 1ADEF* , Tarek Alhamad 2DE , Rita R. Alloway 3DEF , Beatrice P. Concepcion 4DE , Matthew Cooper 5DE , Richard Formica 6DE , Christina L. Klein 7DE , Vineeta Kumar 8DEF , Nicolae Leca 9DE , Fuad Shihab 10DE , David J. Taber 11DE , Sarah Mulnick 12ABCDE , Donald M. Bushnell 12BCDE , Monica Hadi 13ABCDE , Suphamai Bunnapradist 14ADEFDOI: 10.12659/AOT.943498
Ann Transplant 2024; 29:e943498
Table 3 Delphi statement progression, LCPT (Envarsus XR®) use in a de novo setting.
Original statement for consensus* | Status Round 1 | Action Round 2 | Final statusa | Final consensus | Final statement* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. In the de novo setting, Envarsus XR can be used as first-line therapy considering its efficacy and safety are equivalent to BID tacrolimus. A. similar efficacy (biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and graft survival at 12 months B. similar safety profile | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 92% | In the de novo setting, Envarsus XR can be used as first-line therapy considering its efficacy and safety are equivalent to BID tacrolimus. A. Envarsus XR has a similar efficacy profile as tacrolimus IR B. Envarsus XR has a similar safety profile as tacrolimus IR | |
2. When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is not recommended as first-line therapy in patients with significant pre-existing GI motility issues in the de novo settingb | No consensus | No further revisions due to very low consensus, low to moderate perceived strength of evidence and alignment with clinical practice | Dropped after Round 1 | 41% | N/A |
3. When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is preferred as first-line therapy for African American patient population in the de novo setting | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 83% | . When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is preferred as first-line therapy for African American patient population in the de novo setting | |
4. When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is preferred as first-line therapy for elderly patient population in the de novo setting. | No consensus | No further revisions due to low consensus, a lack of supporting evidence and low-to-moderate alignment with clinical practice | Dropped after Round 1 | 58% | N/A |
5. When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is preferred as first-line therapy in known rapid metabolizers in the de novo setting | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 91% | . When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is preferred as first-line therapy as first-line therapy in known rapid metabolizers in the de novo setting | |
6. When considering safety and efficacy, Envarsus XR is preferred as first-line therapy in patients with high immunologic risk in the de novo setting | No consensus | No further revisions due to to very low consensus, low perceived strength of evidence and moderate alignment with clinical practice | Dropped after Round 1 | 25% | N/A |
7. In the de novo setting, the first assessment of trough levels of Envarsus XR be after the third dose | No consensus | Statement revised for consensus in Round 2 | Consensus after R2 | 92% | In the de novo setting, the first assessment of trough levels of Envarsus XR be after the third dose |
8. In the de novo setting, the Envarsus XR dosing should begin with 0.14 mg/kg/day | No consensus | Statement revised for consensus in Round 2 | Consensus after R2b (email round) | 92% | In the de novo setting, the Envarsus XR dosing should begin with 0.14 mg/kg/dayc |
8a. In the de novo setting, ideal body weight should be used as the preferred initial dosing weight for Envarsus XR in obese recipients | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 100% | In the de novo setting, ideal body weight should be used as the preferred initial dosing weight for Envarsus XR in obese recipients | |
9. In the de novo setting, Envarsus XR should be initiated on the morning of POD1 for all kidney transplant recipients, regardless of initial kidney function | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 83% | In the de novo setting, Envarsus XR should be initiated on the morning of POD1 for all kidney transplant recipients, regardless of initial kidney function | |
10. In the de novo setting, initial dosing of Envarsus XR can be reduced in the setting of depleting antibody therapy when using induction therapy | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 83% | In the de novo setting, initial dosing of Envarsus XR can be reduced in the setting of depleting antibody therapy when using induction therapy | |
11. In the de novo setting, initial dosing of Envarsus XR can be in patients for whom the risk of supratherapeutic levels outweighs the benefit of rapid achievement of therapeutic levels () | No consensus | Statement revised for consensus in Round 2 | Consensus after R2 | 100% | In the de novo setting, initial dosing of Envarsus XR can be in patients for whom the risk of supratherapeutic levels outweighs the benefit of rapid achievement of therapeutic levels |
12. During the first week post-transplant the dose of Envarsus XR should only be adjusted in circumstances of a supratherapeutic level or circumstances of a significantly subtherapeutic trough level suggestive of rapid metabolism (e.g., tacrolimus trough | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 75% | During the first week post-transplant the dose of Envarsus XR should only be adjusted in circumstances of a supratherapeutic level or circumstances of a significantly subtherapeutic trough level suggestive of rapid metabolism (e.g., tacrolimus trough | |
13. Conversion to Envarsus XR is recommended to address neurological side-effects related to BID Tacrolimus | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 100% | Conversion to Envarsus XR is recommended to address neurological side-effects related to BID Tacrolimus | |
14. Steady state is achieved after Envarsus XR dose 7 and therefore, on a stable dose, dose adjustments can be made per clinical practice protocols following the seventh dose | Consensus | Consensus after R1 | 75% | Steady state is achieved after Envarsus XR dose 7 and therefore, on a stable dose, dose adjustments can be made per clinical practice protocols following the seventh dose | |
15. Further evidence of clinical long-term outcomes (graft survival, renal function) support the use of Envarsus XR current clinical practice, in both the de novo setting and conversion setting | No consensus | Statement revised for consensus in Round 2 | Consensus after R2 | 92% | Further evidence of clinical long-term outcomes (graft survival, renal function) support the use of Envarsus XR in current clinical practice, in both the de novo setting and conversion setting |
BID – twice a day; GI – gastrointestinal; POD1 – post-operative day 1. a Consensus was set at ≥75% (at least 9 of the 12 panelists). Final consensus was agreed by all 12 panelists; b No further revisions due to very low consensus, low-to-moderate perceived strength of evidence, and lack of alignment with clinical practice; c Consensus was achieved after 1 round of e-mails after round 2 for this statement only. * in an original statement for consensus indicates wording that has been altered or deleted. in a final statement indicates wording that has been altered or added. |