08 September 2026 : Clinical Research
Comparative Prognostic Performance of Pretransplant AARC, CLIF-C ACLF, and MELD-Na Scores for 90-Day Mortality After Liver Transplantation in Patients With EASL-CLIF Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure
Nguyen Thai Cuong ABCDEF 1, Le Xuan Duong ABCDEF 1, Nguyen Chi Tam BDE 2, Nam Van Do
BDE 2, Ngo Dinh Trung ACDEF 2*
DOI: 10.12659/AOT.954888
Ann Transplant 2026; 31:e954888
Table 3 Pairwise comparison of AUROCs for 90-day mortality.
| Comparison | AUROC difference* | 95% CI | DeLong P value | Holm-adjusted P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AARC vs CLIF-C ACLF | −0.101 | −0.211 to 0.009 | 0.072 | 0.216 |
| AARC vs MELD-Na | −0.060 | −0.177 to 0.058 | 0.319 | 0.638 |
| CLIF-C ACLF vs MELD-Na | 0.041 | −0.115 to 0.197 | 0.604 | 0.638 |
| * Calculated as the AUROC of the first score minus the AUROC of the second score. AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval. | ||||