Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation

02 October 2018: Original Paper  

Fence Angioplasty Prevents Narrowing of Venous Anastomosis in Solitary Pancreas Transplant

Je Ho Ryu ABEF 1,2, Tae Beom Lee BCD 1, Kwang Ho Yang BCEF 1, Taeun Kim ACDE 3, Young Soo Chung CDF 4, Byunghyun Choi ABCEFG 1,2*

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.911379

Ann Transplant 2018; 23:681-690

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graft thrombosis is the leading cause of early graft failure in pancreas transplants. Direct anastomosis grafting of the portal vein to the iliac vein or vena cava generally appears narrowed on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. However, modification of surgical techniques may prevent venous narrowing, which also prevents thrombosis-related graft failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed 31 solitary pancreas transplants since 2015. Retrospective analysis of these patients was performed.

RESULTS: Fence angioplasty was applied in the final 12 cases, and no technical failures or early graft losses occurred in these cases. Three graft losses, including 2 immunologic losses and 1 patient death with functioning graft, occurred after at least postoperative 4 months. The venous anastomoses were evaluated via intraoperative Doppler ultrasound and postoperative CT scans. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound revealed improved spectral waves of venous anastomoses in the fence group (monophasic spectral wave, 42.9% vs. 0%, p=0.017). The fence-graft applied group had no cases of narrowing, whereas the non-fence group had high narrowing rates on CT scans (84.2% vs. 0%, p<0.001). Furthermore, with less use of postoperative heparin, postoperative bleeding rates were lower in the fence group (36% vs. 0%, p=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS: Fence angioplasty is a definitive method for avoiding venous anastomotic stenosis and preventing graft failure due to thrombosis.

Keywords: Anastomosis, Surgical, Pancreas Transplantation, Thrombosis

Background

Pancreas transplant is the only near-cure treatment for type I diabetes mellitus (DM) [1]. The results of pancreas transplant have improved over time. Nevertheless, the actual number of procedures has continuously decreased in the last 2 decades, especially for solitary pancreas transplants (pancreas after kidney transplant; PAK, pancreas transplant alone; PTA) in the United States. The decreases in solitary pancreas transplants were prominent after the publication of a study in JAMA in 2003 [2] in which the authors concluded that patients receiving solitary pancreas transplants had a greater mortality risk compared to those remaining on the waiting list [3]. A subsequent rebuttal letter for that study was also published, with contradictory conclusions [4]. However, the stigma of solitary pancreas transplant has not been overcome.

The other reason for reluctance to perform pancreas transplants is the relatively high rate of surgical complications. One of the major surgical complications after pancreas transplant is early graft failure due to thrombosis [5]. Unfortunately, the early graft loss rate has not improved over the last 30 years [6]. Even in recent reports, the technical failure rate due to thrombosis was 5~10% [7,8]. It is well known that platelet function is decreased in uremic patients, and thrombosis occurs more easily in solitary pancreas transplant than in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants [9]. Furthermore, postoperative heparin for the prevention of thrombosis has increased the risk of postoperative bleeding.

As the outcomes of pancreatic islet transplants are showing better outcomes than before, transplant surgeons face the need for technical perfection even with decreasing opportunities to perform solitary pancreas transplants [10]. If simple modifications of the surgical technique would decrease the risk of graft failure due to thrombosis, the barriers to entry with respect to performing pancreas transplant would be lower, thereby promoting increasing numbers of pancreas transplants. In this article, we suggest that our new surgical technique can minimize graft thrombosis.

Material and Methods

PATIENTS:

Thirty-one solitary pancreas transplants (PAK or PTA) were performed in Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital from August 2015 to January 2018. The mean follow-up period was 14.5±8.0 months. The requirement for ethics approval was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

A. DIRECT ANASTOMOSIS (N=6):

The graft portal vein was anastomosed directly to the recipient’s IVC.

B. DIAMOND-SHAPED PATCH ANASTOMOSIS (N=13): During the back-table procedure, a diamond-shaped patch (D-patch), procured from the same donor’s IVC, was used for reconstruction of the graft portal vein. We aimed to prevent stenosis of the venous anastomosis due to sagging that occurred postoperatively. This procedure was described in our previous report [12].

:

During the back-table preparation procedure, the IVC segment was procured from the donor’s IVC. Next, we divided it in the coronal direction at the same width. Each patch was anastomosed to the graft portal vein anteriorly and posteriorly and then anastomosed to each other at the corner. A small split incision to the graft portal vein was needed because the IVC was usually wider than the graft portal vein. In the recipient procedure, the fence was anastomosed to the recipient’s IVC.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION:

Anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin®, 5 mg/kg, divided 5 times; postoperative days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6) induction was used. Tacrolimus (trough level, 9~11 ng/ml) and mycophenolate mofetil (1.5 grams/day) were prescribed. The dose of steroid was decreased to 10 mg after surgery during admission and stopped after 2 months, with routine monitoring of blood amylase and lipase. The dual immunosuppressant (tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil) regimen was used after cessation of the steroid.

ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY:

Intravenous conventional heparin (about 350 units/h) was prescribed to prevent thrombosis in the first 5 patients after computed tomography (CT) scan. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, 1 mg/kg/day) was used in 20 patients for 1 week. Nafamostat mesylate (NM) was used in the last 9 patients. In the last 9 patients, LMWH was used together with the NM in 4 cases. No heparin was used in the last 5 patients.

:

Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound was performed in 26 patients. We observed the arterial flow, the size of the venous anastomoses, the state of the color Doppler in the venous anastomoses, and the spectral waves in the venous anastomoses. We only analyzed spectral waves since the size of the venous anastomoses and state of the color Doppler were somewhat subjective findings.

:

CT scans were obtained at least twice on postoperative day 0 and before discharge in every patient. The state of the venous anastomosis was evaluated by a radiologist. We considered that the vessel was narrowed if only 1 narrowing was observed in both CT scans. Graft thrombosis also was detected by CT scans.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

The patients who had fence angioplasty (fence group) and those who did not (non-fence group) were compared via statistical analysis.

Categorical variables are expressed in terms of absolute and relative frequencies. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). The t test was used to compare the results of quantitative assays, and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the changes in fasting glucose, C-peptide, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in both groups. The differences were considered to be significant at p<0.05. Graft survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Statistical calculations were performed using PASW statistics for Windows (Version 21; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

DEMOGRAPHICS AND BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS:

Thirty-one isolated pancreas transplants were performed from 2015 to January 2018. Among them, the last 12 cases were in the fence angioplasty group. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients in this study. There was no significant difference in recipients’ ages, sex, PTA, and distribution of type of diabetes between the non-fence group and the fence group. Body mass index and preoperative HbA1c were also similar between the 2 groups. The majority of recipients had type I DM and could not control their blood glucose.

The pancreas donor risk index (pDRI) was analyzed as suggested by Axelrod et al. [13]. The pDRI was slightly higher in the fence group. However, according to the report, the 2 groups were in the same pDRI group, which meant they had similar risks of long-term graft failure.

RADIOLOGIC FINDINGS:

Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound (IODU) was obtained for all recipients except in the first 5 cases. We observed the venous anastomosis sizes, the states of the color Doppler, and the spectral wave. The fence group showed wider anastomosis and no turbulent flow on the IODU. However, these are not objective findings; therefore, we only analyzed the spectral wave. The monophasic spectral wave, which suggested stenosis of the venous anastomoses, was only seen in the non-fence group (Table 2, Figure 2).

CT scans were performed for all recipients. There was no narrowing of the venous anastomoses in the fence group (Table 2, Figure 3). Most patients in the non-fence group had narrowing. Interestingly, all patients showed narrowing in the direct anastomosis.

Venous thrombosis rates were similar in both groups. However, most of them had partial thrombosis located in the end of the splenic vein or superior mesenteric vein. Only 1 patient in the non-fence group had an open thrombectomy, due to a near-total obstruction of the vein, while the others were treated with heparinization or just observation.

There were no episodes of arterial thrombosis.

CLINICAL FINDINGS:

There were no technical failures, which was defined as early graft loss or re-use of insulin within the first 3 postoperative months. The amount of heparin used in the first week was much less in the fence group. Furthermore, no heparin was prescribed to the last 5 patients. A decrease in the use of heparin resulted in less bleeding. There was no postoperative bleeding that required surgical re-exploration in the fence group.

Regarding graft function, postoperative C-peptide levels were increased in both groups. Fasting glucose and HbA1c were rapidly normalized after transplant. There were no differences in these changes in metabolic findings between the 2 groups (Figure 4).

PATIENT AND GRAFT SURVIVAL:

Three graft losses occurred. The first was due to an immunologic rejection, the second failure resulted from non-compliance with the immunosuppressant medication, and the last was a death with functioning graft that occurred due to cholangiocarcinoma. All of these patients were in the non-fence group; however, there were no statistically significant differences due to different observational periods.

Figure 5 shows the survival curve for the grafts in all recipients. The 1-year and 2-year graft survival rates were 91.5% and 83.2%, respectively.

Discussion

VENOUS THROMBOSIS AND FENCE ANGIOPLASTY:

Graft thrombosis is the leading cause of technical failure in pancreas transplant [14]. The early graft failure rate is higher in isolated pancreas transplants than in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants, even in recent reports [15]. Then why does thrombosis occur easily in the pancreas graft? Why does thrombosis not occur in kidney or liver allografts? We assume the reason is the difference in blood flow. In a previous report, we suggested that the most important cause of graft thrombosis is altered blood flow [16]. Venous thrombosis rather than arterial thrombosis is the main cause of early graft failure if there is no technical error. Arterial thrombosis occurs later, after venous congestion due to venous thrombosis, except in cases of technical errors (Figure 6). Hakeem et al. also reported that arterial thrombosis was detected later than venous thrombosis on CT scans [17].

The resistance to flow in small tubes was described by G. Hagen and J. Poiseuille [18]. They found that resistance to flow is a function of the inner radius of the tube (r), the length of the tube (L), and the viscosity of the fluid. Their observations are expressed in the following equation, known as the Hagen-Poiseuille equation:

ΔP is the pressure gradient and Q is the steady flow of fluid in a hollow and rigid tube. R is the resistance to flow in small tubes. This equation indicates that a 2-fold increase in the radius of the tube will result in a 16-fold increase in flow. The length of the tube and the flow of fluid are inversely proportional. This principle is also consistent with the results observed in clinical practice. Wider and shorter anastomoses are better for maintaining blood flow. The size of the opening is more important than the length, according the equation above.

Fence angioplasty makes the opening more than twice as wide, which means resistance would be decreased to at least 1/16. Then, even though the length was elongated, blood flow could be maintained without disturbance.

We followed some different approaches to venous anastomosis. The diamond-shaped patch (D-patch) is the one of them [12]. Unfortunately, the D-patch technique could not guarantee the wide opening in the postoperative CT scan (Table 2). Furthermore, the technique took more effort and more time. However, fence angioplasty is easy and not time consuming in anastomosis. We prefer to use the IVC for the patch rather than any other veins due to its thickness and durability and the fact that it could always be obtained from the same cadaveric donor. The IVC is usually wider than the portal vein. We usually made slit incisions in the graft portal vein, which makes the anastomosis between the IVC and the portal vein wider. This is the second advantage of fence angioplasty.

INTRAOPERATIVE DOPPLER ULTRASOUND FINDINGS:

IODU findings are well known in the field of living donor liver transplants [19]. Intraoperative B-mode ultrasound can show the strictures along the right hepatic vein in a liver transplant by direct visualization. Pulsed Doppler images show the monophasic spectral wave instead of the triphasic spectral wave in cases of right hepatic vein stenosis. Biphasic or triphasic spectral wave forms reflect not only the flow of venous drainage, but also the motion of the heart valves, which indicates that the resistance is low. This is a very sensitive finding in hepatic vein stenosis in living donor liver transplantation [20].

In this study, we evaluated portal vein flow by IODU. Monophasic spectral waves were only seen in the non-fence group. There was only a small variation of flow according to the respirations in the monophasic spectral wave. The fence angioplasty overcame this finding since wider anastomoses meant low resistance of the anastomoses. The biphasic spectral wave reflected the motion of the heart valves. The anastomotic site was larger in B-mode, and color Doppler findings showed no turbulent flow in the fence group. However, these were subjective findings; therefore, we did not include those findings in the results section.

CT SCAN FINDINGS:

Stenosis is a pathologic narrowing, but all narrowings are not pathologic findings. Therefore, we elected to refer to narrowing instead of stenosis in this article. We insist that the narrowing of venous anastomoses is the ‘default’ state, if modifications are not applied on the postoperative CT scan. This is caused by low flow of the graft pancreas. The direct anastomosis always showed narrowing in CT scans without exception. The fence angioplasty overcame this finding, since wider openings using vena cava patches made for more durability and wider anastomoses as seen on CT scan.

There was no difference in partial thrombosis on CT scans between the 2 groups. Most of the thromboses were non-occlusive partial thromboses of the splenic veins. The only case of near-occlusive thrombosis occurred in the non-fence group and required thrombectomy. Harbell et al. reported that arterial signal abnormalities with splenic thrombosis, such as absence or reversal of diastolic flow within the graft, require urgent operative intervention. Partial non-occlusive splenic vein thrombus does not increase the risk of graft loss [21]. There was no arterial signal abnormality in our study. Hakeem et al. described a CT grading system for pancreas allograft thrombosis [17]. They also reported that therapeutic anticoagulation is not necessary for non-occlusive peripheral venous thrombosis. The problem is in the extension of venous thrombi. Peripheral non-occlusive thrombi do not increase the risk of graft loss. However, a central occlusive venous thrombus in an anastomotic portal vein is associated with a very high risk of graft loss [17,21,22]. The narrowing itself is not a pathologic finding. This is the result of decreased flow through the portal vein. However, if the narrowing can be avoided, the risk of graft loss would be decreased. The fence angioplasty guarantees a wider opening of the anastomosis site, which minimizes the risk of central occlusive venous thrombosis. The fence angioplasty is the definite method for minimizing the narrowing of an anastomosis site on CT scan.

CLINICAL FINDINGS AND GRAFT SURVIVAL:

In this study, there were no technical failures in either group. There may be several reasons for this. First, the donors had low pDRI scores. The majority of donors were young, and the cold ischemic time was very short because Korea is not a big country. Second, the CT scan on the day of surgery or the first postoperative day detects early graft thrombosis. Subsequently, we used heparin aggressively, especially in the early period, in our center. Early CT scans and the aggressive use of heparin leads to low graft failure due to thrombosis [23]. Third, use of the vena cava for venous anastomosis has the advantage of low technical failure rate [12,24].

The postoperative use of heparin has been justified due to the risk of thrombosis [17,21,23,25]. However, heparinization increases the risk of postoperative bleeding. Seven cases of bleeding occurred in the non-fence group and most were related to the use of heparin. We minimized use of heparin after fence angioplasty was applied. Even in the last 5 patients, we did not use heparin at all. Biphasic spectral wave in IODU and non-narrowing patent venous anastomosis on CT scan indicated that the use of heparin was not necessary. The lack of heparin led to no postoperative bleeding in the fence group.

Conclusions

The fence angioplasty minimizes the narrowing of the venous anastomosis, which makes for low resistance of blood flow in the anastomotic site. This method also decreases the need to use heparin, which minimizes the risk of postoperative bleeding. Fence angioplasty is a simple but strong surgical technique that minimizes graft loss due to thrombosis.

References

1. Dholakia S, Mittal S, Quiroga I, Pancreas transplantation: Past, present, future: Am J Med, 2016; 129(7); 667-73, pmid: 26965300

2. Stratta RJ, Fridell JA, Gruessner AC, Pancreas transplantation: A decade of decline: Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2016; 21(4); 386-92, pmid: 27096564

3. Venstrom JM, McBride MA, Rother KI, Survival after pancreas transplantation in patients with diabetes and preserved kidney function: JAMA, 2003; 290(21); 2817-23, pmid: 14657065

4. Gruessner RW, Sutherland DE, Gruessner AC, Mortality assessment for pancreas transplants: Am J Transplant, 2004; 4(12); 2018-26, pmid: 15575904

5. Troppmann C, Gruessner AC, Benedetti E, Papalois BE, Dunn DL, Najarian JS, Univariate and multivariate operative and nonoperative risk factor analysis: J Am Coll Surg, 1996; 182(4); 285-316, pmid: 8605554

6. Gruessner AC, 2011 update on pancreas transplantation: comprehensive trend analysis of 25,000 cases followed up over the course of twenty-four years at the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR): Rev Diabet Stud, 2011; 8(1); 6-16, pmid: 21720668

7. Horneland R, Paulsen V, Lindahl JP, Pancreas transplantation with enteroanastomosis to native duodenum poses technical challenges – but offers improved endoscopic access for scheduled biopsies and therapeutic interventions: Am J Transplant, 2015; 15(1); 242-50, pmid: 25394773

8. Walter M, Jazra M, Kykalos S, 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: A single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage: Transpl Int, 2014; 27(8); 805-15, pmid: 24750305

9. Escolar G, Diaz-Ricart M, Cases A, Uremic platelet dysfunction: Past and present: Curr Hematol Rep, 2005; 4(5); 359-67, pmid: 16131436

10. Wisel SA, Braun HJ, Stock PG, Current outcomes in islet versus solid organ pancreas transplant for beta-cell replacement in type 1 diabetes: Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2016; 21(4); 399-404, pmid: 27258578

11. Fridell JA, Powelson JA, Kubal CA, Retrieval of the pancreas allograft for whole-organ transplantation: Clin Transplant, 2014; 28(12); 1313-30, pmid: 25203627

12. Ryu JH, Lee TB, Park YM, Pancreas transplant with duodeno-duodenostomy and caval drainage using a diamond patch graft: A single-center experience: Anna Transplant, 2017; 22; 24-34

13. Axelrod DA, Sung RS, Meyer KH, Systematic evaluation of pancreas allograft quality, outcomes and geographic variation in utilization: Am J Transplant, 2010; 10(4); 837-45, pmid: 20121753

14. Humar A, Ramcharan T, Kandaswamy R, Technical failures after pancreas transplants: why grafts fail and the risk factors – a multivariate analysis: Transplantation, 2004; 78(8); 1188-92, pmid: 15502718

15. Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Pancreas transplantation of US and non-US cases from 2005 to 2014 as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR): Rev Diabet Stud, 2016; 13(1); 35-58, pmid: 26982345

16. Choi BH, Lee HY, Park YM, Formation of collateral veins in a graft pancreas after a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: A case report: Transplant Proc, 2015; 47(7); 2270-73, pmid: 26361697

17. Hakeem A, Chen J, Iype S, Pancreatic allograft thrombosis: Suggestion for a CT grading system and management algorithm: Am J Transplant, 2018; 18(1); 163-79, pmid: 28719059

18. Chien S, Usami S, Skalak R, Blood flow in small tubes: Hand book of physiology, Section 2: The cardiovascular system, 1984; 217-49

19. Abdelaziz O, Attia H, Doppler ultrasonography in living donor liver transplantation recipients: Intra- and post-operative vascular complications: World J Gastroenterol, 2016; 22(27); 6145-72, pmid: 27468207

20. Ko EY, Kim TK, Kim PN, Hepatic vein stenosis after living donor liver transplantation: evaluation with Doppler US: Radiology, 2003; 229(3); 806-10, pmid: 14576444

21. Harbell JW, Morgan T, Feldstein VA, Splenic vein thrombosis following pancreas transplantation: Identification of factors that support conservative management: Am J Transplant, 2017; 17(11); 2955-62, pmid: 28707821

22. Han K, Ko HK, Tsauo J, Endovascular management for the treatment of pancreas transplant venous thrombosis: A single-center experience: J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016; 27(6); 882-88, pmid: 27107981

23. Kim YH, Park JB, Lee SS, How to avoid graft thrombosis requiring graftectomy: Immediate posttransplant CT angiography in pancreas transplantation: Transplantation, 2012; 94(9); 925-30, pmid: 23034560

24. Laftavi MR, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Surgery of pancreas transplantation: Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2017; 22(4); 389-97, pmid: 28682797

25. Aboalsamh G, Anderson P, Al-Abbassi A, Heparin infusion in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation reduces graft thrombosis and improves graft survival: Clin Transplant, 2016; 30(9); 1002-9, pmid: 27293140

In Press

Original article  

Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568  

Original article  

Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589  

Database Analysis  

Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289  

Original article  

Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997  

Most Viewed Current Articles

24 Aug 2021 : Review article   18,372

Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future Perspectives

DOI :10.12659/AOT.931664

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664

05 Apr 2022 : Original article   14,731

Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

DOI :10.12659/AOT.935604

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604

22 Nov 2022 : Original article   14,244

Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988

29 Dec 2021 : Original article   13,752

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358
Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358