Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation

04 February 2020: Original Paper  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Renal Artery Stenosis in China in the Era of Donation After Cardiac Death

Qiang Wang ABCD 1, Xiaoli Li ABCD 2, Zhijia Liu ABCD 3, Junnan Xu B 3, Yong Han B 3, Tao Yu C 3, Song Chen C 4, Yuzhe Tang D 4, Yubao Liu D 4, Xiang Li AEFG 3*

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.918076

Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e918076

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and treatment strategies of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) with kidneys from donation after cardiac death (DCD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected the clinical data of donors and recipients of single-center DCD-induced TRAS from January 2015 to June 2017.

RESULTS: All the 8 cases of TRAS were from hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys. The mean donor age was 53.5 (45~57) years, with mean BMI 27.8 (26.4~32.3) kg/m², atherosclerosis index 5.8 (4.9~7.0), and renal atherosclerotic plaque. Clinical features of TRAS were: refractory hypertension with elevated serum creatinine >50%, and negative urine protein and occult blood. Ultrasound of transplanted kidneys showed renal blood flow index 0.49 (0.43~0.55). Angiography confirmed the diagnosis of renal artery trunk or secondary branch stenosis. There were 2 cases of moderate stenosis and 6 cases of severe stenosis. Six patients underwent stent implantation and 2 patients underwent balloon dilatation. Seven patients had serum creatinine recovery after interventional therapy during follow-up. The transplanted kidney of 1 patient ruptured 6 h after interventional therapy and was then resected.

CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRAS with hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys is relatively high, which is a warning to kidney transplant physicians. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the most reliable diagnostic means of TRAS and can be performed concurrently with intervention therapy. If the donor has severe atherosclerosis, plaques that are visible to the unaided eye in the renal artery trunk should be removed as completely as possible.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, Hypertension, Kidney Transplantation, Renal Artery Obstruction, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Creatinine, Kidney, Postoperative Complications, young adult

Background

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) severely affects hemodynamics of the grafted kidney. It can cause refractory hypertension and renal dysfunction, and can even progress to graft failure, which ultimately may reduce the survival rate of grafted kidneys [1–3]. The incidence of TRAS varies greatly depending on the diagnostic method used, ranging from 1% to 23% [4–6]. At present, the main source of organ donation in China has been completely transformed from traditional judicial channels to DCD, which is different from traditional judicial channels for kidney supply in terms of donor risk, donation procedure, organ function quality assessment, organ harvesting and preservation, and perioperative management of recipients [7–11]. With the new characteristics of kidney donation in the DCD era, donor-derived transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) has become a complication of DCD-originated kidneys that requires more attention. With the changes in the source of donor kidneys in the DCD era, patients who died of cerebrovascular accidents such as cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction have become the main group of organ donors, and they often are accompanied by long-term hypertension or diabetes history, as well having atherosclerotic plaques of large arteries, which can lead to the formation of branching atherosclerotic plaques of the renal artery trunk and even to the renal artery, resulting in stenosis of the renal artery. Therefore, donor-derived transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) has become a complication of concern that needing for more attention to protect the DCD renal supply. In this paper, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of donors and recipients of TRAS in the 8th Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (former 309 Hospital), explored the causes of TRAS in the DCD era, summarized the typical clinical manifestations of TRAS, improved the understanding and diagnosis of this complication, summarized the treatment methods and effects of TRAS, and proposed treatment strategies for renal artery stenosis.

Material and Methods

GENERAL INFORMATION:

A total of 453 patients with DCD donor kidney transplant at the Organ Transplantation Center, the 8th Medical Center of the PLA (formerly 309 Hospital), from January 2015 to June 2017 were selected, and 8 patients confirmed as renal artery stenosis were screened for clinical observation study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the 8th Medical Center of the PLA (formerly 309 Hospital) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

DIAGNOSTIC METHODS:

TRAS should be suspected when the recipients of renal transplantation show the following symptoms: (1) the increase amplitude of serum creatinine is similar to AR, which is more than 50% that of basal creatinine; (2) blood pressure elevation with unknown origin and/or refractory malignant hypertension, which is often accompanied by history of oral ACEI/ARB-aggravated disease conditions; (3) normal or decreased urine output, routine urine protein, negative occult blood; and (4) no abnormal feeling in the transplanted kidney. Color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) examination was performed in the suspected TRAS recipients, and the diagnostic criteria were [12,13]: peak systolic velocity at stenosis >180 cm/s, ratio of the peak velocity of renal artery to the abdominal aorta at the renal artery level during systole ≥3.5; the acceleration time after stenosis >0.07 s (formation of small slow wave) and the acceleration at early systole <300 cm/s; and the difference between renal artery trunk and segmental arterial resistance index >0.15. The initial diagnosis of TRAS was confirmed by DSA of the transplanted kidney. According to the diameter of the stenotic vessel, the degree of stenosis was divided into [14]: mild (25%≤ stenosis ≤50%), moderate (50%< stenosis <75%), and severe (stenosis ≥75%). The donors underwent routine BMI, cervical vascular ultrasound, and donor arterial stiffness index (AI) (calculation method:

TREATMENT:

TRAS was mainly treated by interventional therapy, which was immediately performed after DSA confirmation. Patients with mild stenosis underwent balloon dilatation, and those with moderate or severe stenosis underwent insertion of an appropriate arterial stent according to the vessel diameter and length of stenosis, and the cases without ideal results of stent expansion then underwent balloon re-expansion.

PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AND POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP:

Blood pressure, serum Cr, and transplanted kidney CDFI were monitored regularly during the perioperative period. Surgery-related complications, such as hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, and infection were recorded. For patients with suspected renal artery stenosis, oral clopidogrel (75 mg/d, Sanofi (Hangzhou) Pharmaceutical Co., Hangzhou, China) and aspirin enteric-coated tablets (100 mg/d, Bayer Medicine Health Care, Italy) were routinely given 3 days before surgery for antiplatelet therapy and maintained for 3 months after surgery, followed by 1-year administration of daily oral aspirin enteric-coated tablets (100 mg/d). The patients were postoperatively followed up by clinic service or telephone, as well as routine laboratory tests, anti-rejection drugs, or ultrasound examinations.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

This was a clinical observational study. The data were processed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software. The measurement data and count data were analyzed by the t test and corrected chi-square test, respectively, and are expressed as median or mean±standard deviation (χ̄±s), with P<0.05 being considered as statistical significance.

Results

GENERAL INFORMATION:

The 8th Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (former 309 Hospital) managed 453 cases of DCD-originated kidney transplantation from January 2015 to June 2017, including 108 cases of hypertension-induced cerebrovascular accident (23.8%), 285 cases of brain injury (62.9%), and 60 other cases (13.3%). There were 335 males and 118 females, with an average age of 43 (24~63)) years old. Among these, there were 8 patients with confirmed TRAS, accounting for 1.77% of all kidney transplantations and 7.40% of hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys. Their median onset time was 4 (1–6) months after kidney transplantation. These 8 TRAS patients were 2 females and 6 males, with an average age of 45 (35~56) years old; 2 cases were from the same kidney donor, and 6 cases were from different donors. All 8 patients with TRAS were transplanted with hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys. The mean age of donors was 53.5 (45~57) years, and an average cold ischemia time of 2.0 (0.5~3.5) h. The anastomosis method combined the abdominal aorta valve of the donor kidney with the recipient’s external iliac artery. All 8 patients with TRAS were treated with antithymocyte globulin (ATG, Isetix-SangstatTra) for immunotherapy. For postoperative immunosuppressive regimen, 4 patients received prednisone (Tianjin Jinyao Group Co.)+Mycophenolate (Shanghai Roche Pharmaceutical Co.)+tacrolimus (Astellas Pharma, Inc., Japan), and 4 received prednisone+Mycophenolate+cyclosporine soft capsule (Novartis Pharma, Switzerland).

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DONORS:

There were 7 hypertension cerebrovascular accident DCD donors. Their history of hypertension was 9.5 (7~14) years. Five of these donors (71.4%) also had diabetes. The average BMI of donors was 27.8 (26.4~32.3) Kg/m2, with an average AI of 5.8 (4.9~7.0) and 100% carotid atherosclerotic plaque formation rate. Observation during renal trimming revealed that the abdominal aortic sclerosis rate was 100% and the positive rate of atherosclerotic plaque of renal artery trunk was 85.7% (6/7). In the renal trimming surgery, the main renal artery can pass the 8F red single-lumen catheter, and the lumen was unobstructed (Table 1).

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TRAS:

The median onset time of the 8 cases of TRAS was 4 (1-6) months after renal transplantation. Clinical manifestations were: renal vascular hypertension and ischemic nephropathy of grafted kidney, increased Cr >50% of basal Cr (Table 2), pre-TRAS serum Cr 125.6±37.8 μmol/L, and serum Cr of TRAS-induced ischemic nephropathy 224.5±59.4 μmol/L, P=0.00<0.05. Two patients also had previously been treated with oral valsartan (Changzhou Si Yao Pharmaceutical Co., Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province) and losartan potassium tablets (Hangzhou Merck East Pharmaceutical Co.) for ARB antihypertensive drugs-aggravated disease conditions of negative urine protein and occult blood. Auxiliary examination: CDFI examination: 6 cases (75%) exhibited increased renal aortic blood flow velocity PSV >180 cm/s, 2 cases (25%) exhibited increased renal aortic blood flow velocity while PSV <180 cm/s; the acceleration time of the 8 cases after stenosis was >0.07 s, indicating small slow wave formation. The blood flow index was 0.49 (0.43~0.55). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and interventional therapy (Table 3) showed that all the 8 patients had clear diagnosis of TRAS, 6 of whom were from different donors while 2 were from the same donor (Figure 1A, 1B). The transplanted renal artery of 7 cases showed predominant stenosis (Figure 1C), and 1 case showed secondary stenosis (Figure 1D), eccentric stenosis, constricted stenosis, or occlusion. No anastomotic stenosis of the grafted renal artery was observed. TRAS were moderate in 2 patients and severe in 6 patients. All the patients underwent interventional therapy immediately after DSA diagnosis. Six patients underwent intraoperative arterial stenting together with balloon dilatation, and 1 patient only underwent balloon expansion because the secondary renal artery was stenotic for stenting. There were 2 balloon dilatations, and the interval was 3 months); 1 case was ineffective due to severe renal artery stenosis, and the stent could not be implanted, which ruptured and was removed 6 after the operation, while the other patient had the transplanted kidney resected due to transplanted kidney rupture.

TREATMENT OUTCOMES:

As of December 2018, the follow-up period ranged from 18 to 48 months. There were no complications, such as arterial thrombosis, restenosis, or pseudoaneurysm formation, after interventional therapy in 6 patients with TRAS. The blood pressure was easily controlled in the normal range. In the patient who underwent only balloon expansion due to secondary renal artery stenosis, balloon expansion was re-performed 3 months after interventional therapy due to re-stenosis. The patient with transplanted kidney rupture successfully underwent a second kidney transplant. Seven patients with TRAS treated with DSA re-gained their preoperative Cr level (131.1±35.5 μmol/L).

Discussion

TRAS is a common vascular complication after renal transplantation and is an important factor leading to renal failure and postoperative hypertension [1–3]. According to reports, the incidence of TRAS varies greatly depending on the diagnostic method, ranging from 1% to 23% [4–6]. Most studies on TRAS are single-center retrospective studies. For example, Rengel et al. [15] reported the incidence of TRAS as 4.5% in 286 kidney transplant recipients between 1990 and 1997. The cumulative incidence of TRAS in a 3-year clinical observation by Hurst et al. [16], which analyzed a total of 42 403 kidney transplant recipients registered in the United States kidney data system from 2002 to 2005, was 2%, and the total incidence was 8.3 cases/1000 patients/year (95% CI 7.8–8.9). The prevalence of TRAS in pediatric renal transplantation seems to be lower than in adult renal transplantation. A single-center study [17] showed that the prevalence of TRAS in a retrospective study targeting 216 pediatric patients from 2001 to 2011 was 4.6%. TRAS is the main cause of graft loss and premature death in transplant recipients, accounting for 1–5% of post-transplant hypertension cases and 75% of post-transplant vascular complications [18,19]. According to the USRDS registry, the adjusted risk ratio of death and graft loss in TRAS transplant recipients was 2.84 (95% CI 1.70–4.72) compared with transplant recipients without TRAS [15]. Among the 453 cases in our center, 8 were diagnosed with TRAS, accounting for 1.77% of all kidney transplants. We also found that TRAS mainly occurred in hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys. TRAS accounted for 7.40% of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage DCD-originated kidneys. Therefore, the incidence of TRAS in kidney transplant recipients from the donors with such diseases will increase significantly.

Studies have shown that the occurrence of TRAS is related to the following factors: surgical operation, cold ischemia time, delayed recovery of transplanted kidney function, rejection, CMV infection, atherosclerosis, CNI application, expanded standard donor kidney, mechanical compression, and donor kidney accessory artery, which is often characterized by stenosis at the anastomotic site of blood vessel [19–23]. The incidence of TRAS will be significantly reduced by improving the follow-up by kidney transplant specialists to monitor for these problems and to improve technologies. With the full conversion of major organ sources into DCD transplantation in China, hypertensive cerebrovascular accident has become one of the main sources of DCD donor kidneys. The hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys accounted for 23.8% of the total transplants in our center (108/453 cases). It was also observed that TRAS occurred in the patients with hypertensive cerebrovascular accident DCD-originated kidneys. The DSA-defined stenosis was located in the trunk or secondary branch of the transplanted renal artery, which was eccentric, constricted, or occluded. No anastomotic stenosis was observed at the transplanted renal anastomotic site, which is in contrast to previous clinical evidence for TRAS. Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the important causes of hypertension and/or renal dysfunction. It is generally divided into 2 categories: atherosclerosis and non-atherosclerosis. Most RAS is caused by atherosclerosis [24, 25]. Fuwai Hospital summarized the etiology of RAS in 2047 hospitalized patients consecutively from 1999 to 2014 [26]: 1668 (81.5%) cases of atherosclerosis, 259 (12.7%) cases of arteritis, 86 (4.2%) cases of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), and 34 cases (1.6%) of other. Among the 1728 patients >40 years of age, the leading cause was atherosclerosis (94.7%), followed by arteritis (3.8%). Based on Chinese and international research on the etiology and clinical practice of RAS, the China Healthcare International Association for Promotion of Vascular Diseases and Hypertension has come to a consensus on the 3 main criteria for the diagnosis of RAS; namely, the diagnostic criteria for atherosclerotic RAS [27,28], which consist of the following: (1) with at least 1 risk factor for atherosclerosis (obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, age >40 years old, or long-term smoking); and (2) with at least 2 atherosclerotic imaging findings (stenosis or occlusion of the renal artery, eccentric stenosis, irregular plaque, calcification, mainly involving the proximal segment of the renal artery and opening, and atherosclerotic findings in other abdominal vessels. There were 7 DCD donors with hypertensive cerebrovascular accident in our center, with a history of hypertension as (9.5 (7~14)) years, and 5 cases were combined with diabetes (71.4%); the donor’s average BMI was 27.8 (26.~32.3) kg/m2, with the average AI as 5.8 (4.9~7.0) and carotid atheroma plaque formation rate as 100%. Clinical observation during renal trimming showed that the abdominal aortic sclerosis rate was 100% and positive rate of atherosclerotic plaque in the renal artery was 85.7% (6/7). Stenosis was confirmed by DSA to be located in the trunk or secondary branch of the transplanted renal artery. The stenosis was eccentric stenosis, constricted stenosis, or occlusion. Renal atherosclerotic RAS was confirmed as the underlying cause of TRAS. In this study, the site with renal atherosclerotic plaque at the renal artery can pass the 8F red single-lumen catheter, and the renal artery was unobstructed according to clinical experience, with stenosis less than 50%. The plaques were not removed during surgery because we thought that the trunk residue would be relatively short, thus affecting the vascular anastomosis. Postoperative factors, such as surgical procedures, vasospasm, infection, or other factors, re-aggravated stenosis on the pathological basis of atherosclerosis-caused RASD, which led to ischemic nephropathy.

Conclusions

LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY:

The limitations of this study are that it was a retrospective study with limited clinical observation and short follow-up period. Prospective, longer-term clinical observations are needed to improve diagnosis and treatment in kidney transplantation.

References

1. Chen W, Kayler LK, Zand MS, Transplant renal artery stenosis: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis and therapy: Clin Kidney J, 2015; 8; 71-78, pmid: 25713713

2. Kadoya Y, Zen K, Matoba S, Endovascular treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis based on hemodynamic assessment using a pressure wire: A case report: BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2018; 18; 172-78, pmid: 30134838

3. Valle LGM, Cavalcante RN, Motta-Leal-Filho JM, Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endovascular management for transplant renal artery stenosis: Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2017; 72; 773-79, pmid: 29319724

4. Patel NH, Jindal RM, Wilkin T, Renal arterial stenosis in renal allografts: Retrospective study of predisposing factors and outcome after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: Radiology, 2001; 219; 663-67, pmid: 11376251

5. Fervenza FC, Lafayette RA, Alfrey EJ, Petersen J, Renal artery stenosis in kidney transplants: Am J Kidney Dis, 1998; 31; 142-48, pmid: 9428466

6. Adani GL, Como G, Bonato F, Detection of transplant renal artery stenosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Radiol Case Rep, 2018; 13; 890-94, pmid: 29997718

7. Huang JF, Zheng SS, Liu YF, China organ donation and transplantation update: The Hangzhou Resolution: Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2014; 13; 122-24, pmid: 24686539

8. Sun Q, Huang Z, Zhou H, New factors predicting delayed graft function: A multi-center cohort study of kidney donation after brain death followed by circulatory death: Kidney Blood Press Res, 2018; 43; 893-903, pmid: 29871001

9. Tai Q, Xue W, Ding X, Perfusion parameters of donation after cardiac death kidneys predict early transplant outcomes based on expanded criteria donor designation: Transplant Proc, 2018; 50; 79-84, pmid: 29407336

10. Chen Z, Lai XX, Zhang LDistribution and drug resistance of pathogens in infected organ donors from donation after the citizen death: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2018; 98; 181-85, pmid: 29374911 [in Chinese]

11. Zhang QX, Xie JF, Zhou JD, Impact factors and attitudes toward organ donation among transplantation patients and their caregivers in China: Transplant Proc, 2017; 49; 1975-81, pmid: 29149947

12. Rundback JH, Sacks D, Kent KC, Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials: J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003; 14; S477-92, pmid: 14514863

13. Olin JW, Piedmonte MR, Young JR, The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis: Ann Intern Med, 1995; 122; 833-38, pmid: 7741367

14. Braga AF, Catto RC, Dalio MB, Endovascular approach to transplant renal artery stenosis: Ann Transplant, 2015; 20; 698-706, pmid: 26596354

15. Rengel M, Gomes-Da-Silva G, Incháustegui L, Renal artery stenosis after kidney transplantation: Diagnostic and therapeutic approach: Kidney Int Suppl, 1998; 68; S99-106, pmid: 9839292

16. Hurst FP, Abbott KC, Neff RT, Incidence, predictors and outcomes of transplant renal artery stenosis after kidney transplantation: Analysis of USRDS: Am J Nephrol, 2009; 30; 459-67, pmid: 19776559

17. Ghirardo G, De Franceschi M, Vidal E, Transplant renal artery stenosis in children: Risk factors and outcome after endovascular treatment: Pediatr Nephrol, 2014; 29; 461-57, pmid: 24305958

18. Agüera Fernández LG, Zudaire JJ, Isa WA, Vascular complications in 237 recipients of renal transplant from cadaver: Actas Urol Esp, 1992; 16; 292-95, pmid: 1636451

19. Bruno S, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Transplant renal artery stenosis: J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004; 15; 134-41, pmid: 14694165

20. Touma J, Costanzo A, Boura B, Endovascular management of transplant renal artery stenosis: J Vasc Surg, 2014; 59; 1058-65, pmid: 24365122

21. Kamali K, Abbasi MA, Behzadi AH, Incidence and risk factors of transplant renal artery stenosis in living unrelated donor renal transplantation: J Ren Care, 2010; 36; 149-52, pmid: 20690968

22. Gedroyc WM, Reidy JF, Saxton HM, Arteriography of renal transplantation: Clin Radiol, 1987; 38; 239-43, pmid: 2953524

23. Bavishi C, de Leeuw PW, Messerli FH, Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and hypertension: Pragmatism, pitfalls, and perspectives: Am J Med, 2016; 129; 635.e5-14

24. Safley DM, Chhatriwalla AK, The kidney connection: Holy grail or wild goose chase?: JAMA Intern Med, 2014; 174; 1851-52, pmid: 25222338

25. de Leeuw PW, Postma CT, Kroon AA, Treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: Time for a new approach: JAMA, 2013; 309; 663-64, pmid: 23423409

26. Peng M, Jiang XJ, Dong H, Etiology of renal artery stenosis in 2047 patients: A single-center retrospective analysis during a 15-year period in China: J Hum Hypertens, 2016; 30; 124-28, pmid: 25947274

27. Chrysochou C, Kalra PA, Epidemiology and natural history of atherosclerotic renovascular disease: Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2009; 52; 184-95, pmid: 19917329

28. Bookstein JJ, Abrams HL, Buenger RE, Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension: JAMA, 1972; 220; 1218-24, pmid: 5067310

In Press

Original article  

Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568  

Original article  

Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589  

Database Analysis  

Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289  

Original article  

Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997  

Most Viewed Current Articles

24 Aug 2021 : Review article   18,372

Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future Perspectives

DOI :10.12659/AOT.931664

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664

05 Apr 2022 : Original article   14,731

Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

DOI :10.12659/AOT.935604

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604

22 Nov 2022 : Original article   14,244

Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988

29 Dec 2021 : Original article   13,752

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358
Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358