05 August 2025: Original Paper
Intra-Arterial Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Transcatheter Thrombolysis in Post-Transplant Hepatic Artery Thrombosis: A Preliminary Study
Liqi Sun ABCDEF 1, Yijun Li ABCD 1, Kai Feng ABC 2, Dong Zhao ABCD 3, Hong Yu BCD 4, Zhiyan Li ADEFG 1*, Ningbo Zhao ABCDEFG 1
DOI: 10.12659/AOT.947500
Ann Transplant 2025; 30:e947500
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis is the most common and severe vascular complication after liver transplantations. Transcatheter arterial thrombolysis is a viable alternative with high selectivity, low drug dosage, high local drug concentration, and minimal effect on systemic coagulation function. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) is radiation-free and repeatable, can be performed bedside, and could be an alternative for continuous monitoring. We described the efficacy of IA-CEUS in assessing the effect of continuous transcatheter arterial thrombolysis in post-liver transplant hepatic artery thrombosis in a series of cases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients with diagnosis of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation between November 2016 and May 2023 were selected. All 8 patients underwent continuous transcatheter arterial thrombolysis, using urokinase. Dynamic IA-CEUS monitoring was performed for each patient during the thrombolysis treatment. Hepatic artery digital subtraction angiography was used to verify the results.
RESULTS: Two patients showed a hepatic artery perfusion defect. Six patients demonstrated good perfusion of artery. Three patients developed biloma. One patient developed a dissection aneurysm. One patient developed a pseudoaneurysm with catheter displacement in it. One patient developed retroperitoneal hematoma. None of the patients experienced contrast agent-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: IA-CEUS was found to be safe and feasible as a new option for evaluating the efficacy of transcatheter arterial thrombolysis in post-liver transplant hepatic artery thrombosis.
Keywords: Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal, Liver Transplantation, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Humans, Hepatic Artery, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Thrombosis, Thrombolytic Therapy, adult, Contrast Media, Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator, Ultrasonography, Fibrinolytic Agents, Postoperative Complications, Aged
Introduction
Liver transplantation is commonly performed in malignant hepatic tumors and end-stage liver diseases [1–3]. Vascular complications after liver transplantations are often of significant concern, as they can jeopardize the blood supply to the newly transplanted liver [4]. Among them, hepatic artery thrombosis is the most common and severe vascular complication, with an incidence ranging from 2% to 9% [5,6]. Failure to promptly and effectively manage hepatic artery thrombosis could result in biliary complications, hepatic infarction, liver abscess, and, in severe cases, graft loss and recipient death [7].
Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment measures could significantly improve the prognosis of the recipients [7]. Historically, revisional surgery, including thrombectomy and reanastomosis, served as the main treatment strategy. Re-transplantation becomes an alternative when revision fails. However, this approach was often limited by donor shortage and the overall physical states of the patient [8–10]. Over the past decades, endovascular interventional therapies became an alternative for those patients. The effectiveness and safety of catheter-based endovascular intervention therapy have been verified, and the therapy has even replaced surgical procedures for the first choice in selected cases [9,11,12]. Transcatheter arterial thrombolysis involves the placement of a catheter into the corresponding hepatic artery under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for continuous thrombolysis. It has advantages such as high selectivity, low drug dosage, high local drug concentration, and minimal impact on systemic coagulation function [9,11]. The technical success rate of thrombolysis could reach up to 80% [13,14], making it a viable alternative for graft salvage.
The thrombolysis process requires continuous monitoring with DSA, which can present with several limitations: repeated exposure to radiation, infeasibility of bedside execution, and the inability to assess overall liver perfusion. Compared with DSA and computed tomography (CT) angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is radiation-free and repeatable, can be performed bedside, and can be used for assessing liver perfusion. In addition, the ultrasound contrast agent, sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles, are excreted by breathing in a few minutes, which is especially suitable for patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency. Some studies have reported that CEUS allows for the diagnosis of hepatic artery thrombosis [15,16] and reduces the use of invasive imaging methods [17]. To date, there have been no studies on the use of intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) for evaluating the efficacy of hepatic artery thrombolysis. In this study, we aim to describe the value of IA-CEUS on monitoring transcatheter hepatic artery thrombolysis by presenting a series of cases.
Material and Methods
This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital, and all enrolled patients signed written informed consent forms.
A total of 468 cases of orthotopic liver transplantation were performed from November 2016 to May 2023. Color Doppler ultrasound was used for follow-up of the liver transplant recipients in the postoperative period. Once the hepatic artery blood flow was not detected, a DSA or CT angiography examination was conducted immediately to verify whether hepatic artery thrombosis developed. A total of 22 patients developed hepatic artery thrombosis after the surgery. Of these patients, 8 patients (7 men and 1 women, aged from 28 to 69 years, with average age of 44 years) underwent continuous transcatheter-based thrombolysis through the hepatic artery and were monitored using IA-CEUS. Six patients developed early postoperative hepatic artery thrombosis (within 1 month after the surgery), and 2 developed late postoperative hepatic artery thrombosis (more than 1 month after the surgery). All liver grafts were obtained from brain-dead donors.
The Mindray Resona7 ultrasound diagnostic system was used, along with the SC5-1U convex array transducer, with frequency of 3.5 to 5.0 MHz. IA-CEUS was performed with a mechanical index set between 0.04 and 0.12. The contrast agent used was a sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue, Bracco, Italy), which was diluted with 5 mL of 0.9% sodium solution and thoroughly shaken to form a suspension.
The patients were placed in a supine position on the DSA examination table. With routine electrocardiographic monitoring, the femoral artery was punctured using the Seldinger technique. After successful puncture, a guidewire and vascular sheath were inserted. Guided by the guidewire, a 5F Yashiro or hepatic artery catheter was introduced into the celiac trunk or the vessel opening of the hepatic artery-anastomosis. Contrast agent was injected to perform angiography and accurately locate the hepatic artery thrombus. Then, urokinase was administered through the catheter for thrombolysis, with a pump rate of 100 000 units/10 min, and a maximum dose of up to 300 000 units during the procedure. Continuous infusion was given to maintain thrombolysis, with a total urokinase dose not exceeding 1 200 000 units within 24 h. The duration of thrombolysis did not exceed 7 days.
All IA-CEUS examinations were conducted at the bedside by an ultrasound physician (NingBo Zhao), who has more than 5 years of experience in liver IA-CEUS and interpretation of the results. Prior to IA-CEUS, a 2-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound examination was performed to assess liver parenchyma, portal and hepatic arterial blood flow, and spectra. A mixture of contrast agent suspension and 0.9% saline solution in a ratio of 1: 49 was prepared. Then, 3 mL of the mixture was injected by continuous injection through the catheter. The dynamic contrast-enhanced images videos were stored for 5 min. The observations included hepatic artery and liver parenchymal perfusion, as well as the position of the catheter tip. DSA was used as the reference standard. All patients were monitored using IA-CEUS during continuous intra-arterial thrombolysis, The initial IA-CEUS examination was performed 6 h after thrombolysis, followed by subsequent examinations every 6 h until the catheter was removed. DSA examinations were performed 24 h before catheter removal to verify the result of IA-CEUS.
Results
Among the 8 patients with hepatic artery thrombosis confirmed by DSA, 6 patients were asymptomatic and received a diagnosis during routine follow-up; 1 patient required hepatic artery balloon dilation, due to low hepatic arterial blood flow, and subsequently developed hepatic artery thrombosis; and 1 patient developed hepatic artery thrombosis after the splenic artery embolization procedure, due to splenic artery steal syndrome.
Thrombosis in 6 patients occurred near the anastomosis of the hepatic artery, and 2 occurred in the right hepatic artery away from the anastomosis. The duration of thrombolysis ranged from 1 to 7 days. After continuous thrombolysis treatment (3 patients also received arterial stent placement, due to poor thrombolysis effect), thrombolysis was successful in 6 patients and showed hepatic artery perfusion within 1 to 2 s after contrast agent injection (Figure 1). Thrombolysis was ineffective in 2 patients and showed no hepatic artery perfusion over time; therefore, the vascular reconstruction surgery was conducted. In all cases, IA-CEUS showed a decrease in enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma in the hepatic artery supply region. In the 2 patients with thrombolysis failure, most hepatic segments showed no enhancement during the arterial phase, with small enhanced areas by the liver collateral artery blood supplies. Three patients formed biloma with non-enhancement, of which 2 were confirmed by surgery, and 1 by puncture drainage fluid (Figure 2).
Two patients experienced catheter-related complications. In 1 patient, IA-CEUS showed peeling intima in the dilated hepatic artery and the true and false lumen. DSA confirmed the development of a dissecting aneurysm. In the other patient, IA-CEUS showed a pseudo-aneurysm adjacent to the hepatic artery, with the catheter displacement in the pseudo-aneurysm (Figure 3). One patient experienced thrombolysis-related spontaneous bleeding, resulting in a retroperitoneal hematoma. No serious bleeding complications, such as intracranial hemorrhage were observed in the patients. Also, there were no ultrasound contrast agent-related complications (Tables 1, 2).
Discussion
In this study, we described the efficacy and safety of a new method of IA-CEUS for the dynamic monitoring of intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.
Color Doppler ultrasound is the most commonly used method for vascular monitoring after liver transplantation. Hepatic artery thrombosis appears as a loss of hepatic arterial flow on Doppler ultrasound. However, this could be influenced by operator experience, equipment quality, and patient conditions, resulting in unreliable results [18]. CEUS uses the nonlinear effects and backscatter properties of microbubbles in the sonic field to enhance the contrast between tissues and blood flow, thereby enabling clearer visualization of blood perfusion. Compared with Doppler ultrasound, CEUS is more sensitive and accurate in blood vessel visualizing and vascular-related lesion detection [15]. The contrast agent used in this study, SonoVue, is a pure blood-pool contrast agent that does not extravasate into the extravascular space and is primarily composed of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles, which provide a duration of approximately 8 min of continuous enhancement in the liver. IA-CEUS is a non-radiating procedure that could be performed bedside and allows for repeated injections, making it particularly suitable for the dynamic monitoring of the therapeutic effect of hepatic artery thrombolysis. Moschouris et al [19] and Lekht et al [20] reported that IA-CEUS can effectively display the blood supply arteries of hepatocellular carcinoma, improving the accuracy of selective arterial embolization. It could also predict the prognosis by assessing changes in microvascular perfusion before and after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma [21,22].
In our study, IA-CEUS successfully evaluated vascular patency in 8 patients after hepatic artery thrombolysis. Additionally, IA-CEUS demonstrated positive diagnostic performance in monitoring vascular complications. Bleeding is the most common complication of thrombolysis, with an incidence of approximately 20% [23]. In cases with bleeding complications, IA-CEUS can assist clinical doctors in adjusting the dosage by dynamically monitoring the hematomas. In the present study, 1 patient developed a retroperitoneal hematoma, which was considered to be spontaneous bleeding caused by coagulation dysfunction rather than hepatic artery hemorrhage. Studies have shown that iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms are associated with vascular wall damage of invasive procedures [24–26], with an incidence of rupture ranging from 21% to 80% in iatrogenic cases [27]. One patient developed a pseudoaneurysm with catheter displacement, which was directly related to the vascular wall damage of the catheter. Dynamic monitoring with IA-CEUS could detect pseudoaneurysms promptly, enabling quick intervention. One patient developed hepatic artery dissection, likely caused by intravascular intimal dissection during the intervention, which could increase the risk of postoperative hepatic artery stenosis and thrombosis, potentially leading to graft failure. Early detection by IA-CEUS dynamic monitoring and proactive intervention can help prevent the occurrence of serious complications.
IA-CEUS can also show hepatic parenchymal perfusion [28], in addition to hepatic artery thrombosis-related liver complications. In this study, IA-CEUS detected ischemic areas in the liver for all patients, which were manifested as hypoenhancement of the liver supplied by the hepatic artery [18]. Three of the patients developed biloma, one of the most severe complications related to bile ducts. Biloma could be a result of ischemia and necrosis of intrahepatic bile ducts, which is attributed to the accumulation and encapsulation of bile within the liver. In the case of concurrent infection, liver abscesses can form and require drainage treatment [18,28].
The preliminary results showed the feasibility and safety of using IA-CEUS for the dynamic assessment of the efficacy and complications of intra-arterial hepatic artery thrombolysis. However, there were also some limitations of IA-CEUS, which is highly operator-dependent. Also, IA-CEUS could not provide comprehensive image information, like that of CT and magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, in some cases, IA-CEUS might not provide sufficient diagnostic information. To date, no previous reports have described the application of IA-CEUS specifically for the dynamic evaluation of intra-arterial hepatic artery thrombolysis. IA-CEUS using the catheter approach enables highly selective CEUS imaging, avoiding repeated exposures to radiation for patients during thrombolysis and additional invasive procedures, such as intravenous injections.
The present study had several limitations. First, this was a small-sample, descriptive, and single-center study, without comparison with other imaging modalities in validating the efficacy of IA-CEUS. Additional prospective, multicenter studies are needed to confirm the results and compare them with other imaging methods. Second, IA-CEUS describes hepatic artery thrombolysis efficacy based on vessel patency or occlusion, without assessing the partial reperfusion of the hepatic artery, which requires further investigated. Finally, this technique relies on the placement of a catheter in the hepatic artery, which is inherently invasive, making it potentially more suitable for the dynamic monitoring of arterial interventional therapy rather than screening for hepatic artery diseases in routine clinical practice.
Conclusions
IA-CEUS is a novel and effective method for the assessment of continuous transcatheter arterial thrombolysis for post-liver transplant hepatic artery thrombosis.
Figures
Figure 1. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) for monitoring vascular patency of continuous thrombolysis. The patient was a 30-year-old man, 9 days after iver transplantation. (A) Color Doppler ultrasound showed well perfusion of the hepatic artery. (B) IA-CEUS showed perfusion of the hepatic artery. (C) Digital subtraction angiography showed partial perfusion of the hepatic artery.
Figure 2. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) diagnosis of intrahepatic biloma. A 50-year-old man developed hepatic artery thrombosis after hepatic artery balloon dilation, due to low hepatic artery flow 2 months after liver transplantation. (A) Two-dimensional ultrasound detected hypoechoic area in the liver. (B) Portal vein showed good perfusion, while the adjacent hepatic artery showed no perfusion on IA-CEUS. (C) IA-CEUS showed non-enhanced area in the liver, indicating a biloma. (D) The patient underwent emergency surgical resection of the lesion. (E) Postoperative pathology confirmed the biloma ().
Figure 3. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) showed a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm during thrombolysis monitoring. The patient was a 46-year-old man, 3 months after liver transplantation, who developed hepatic artery thrombosis after splenic artery embolization for splenic steal syndrome. (A) IA-CEUS showed a cystic structure adjacent to the hepatic artery. (B) IA-CEUS showed the catheter within it (). (C) Digital subtraction angiography confirmed the catheter displacement within the pseudoaneurysm. (D) Computed tomography angiography also confirmed the result. References
1. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 Practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: Hepatology, 2018; 68; 723-50
2. Wendon J, Cordoba J, Dhawan A, EASL Clinical Practical Guidelines on the management of acute (fulminant) liver failure: J Hepatol, 2017; 66; 1047-81
3. European Association for the Study of the Liver, EASL Clinical practice guidelines: Liver transplantation: J Hepatol, 2016; 64; 433-85
4. Pérez-Saborido B, Pacheco-Sánchez D, Barrera-Rebollo A, Incidence, management, and results of vascular complications after liver transplantation: Transplant Proc, 2011; 43; 749-50
5. Bastón Castiñeiras M, Benítez Linero I, Serrano Zarcero V, Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplant: Experience in the last 10 years: Transplant Proc, 2022; 54; 51-53
6. Ghazaly M, Sethi P, Kathirvel M, Risk for arterial thrombosis after liver transplantation with hepatic artery reconstruction: BJS Open, 2022; 6(1); zrab146
7. Bekker J, Ploem S, de Jong KP, Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: A systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors: Am J Transplant, 2009; 9; 746-57
8. Silva MA, Jambulingam PS, Gunson BK, Hepatic artery thrombosis following orthotopic liver transplantation: A 10-year experience from a single centre in the United Kingdom: Liver Transpl, 2006; 12; 146-51
9. Abdelaziz O, Hosny K, Amin A, Endovascular management of early hepatic artery thrombosis after living donor liver transplantation: Transpl Int, 2012; 25; 847-56
10. Pareja E, Cortes M, Navarro R, Vascular complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: Hepatic artery thrombosis: Transplant Proc, 2010; 42; 2970-72
11. Singhal A, Stokes K, Sebastian A, Wright HI, Kohli V, Endovascular treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis following liver transplantation: Transpl Int, 2010; 23; 245-56
12. Panaro F, Gallix B, Bouyabrine H, Liver transplantation and spontaneous neovascularization after arterial thrombosis: “The neovascularized liver”: Transpl Int, 2011; 24; 949-57
13. Park J, Kim SH, Park SJ, Hepatic artery thrombosis following living donor liver transplantation: A 14-year experience at a single center: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020; 27; 548-54
14. Saad WE, Davies MG, Saad NE, Catheter thrombolysis of thrombosed hepatic arteries in liver transplant recipients: Predictors of success and role of thrombolysis: Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2007; 41; 19-26
15. Hom BK, Shrestha R, Palmer SL, Prospective evaluation of vascular complications after liver transplantation: Comparison of conventional and microbubble contrast-enhanced US: Radiology, 2006; 241; 267-74
16. Lu Q, Zhong XF, Huang ZX, Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in decision support for diagnosis and treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: Eur J Radiol, 2012; 81; e338-43
17. Sidhu PS, Shaw AS, Ellis SM, Microbubble ultrasound contrast in the assessment of hepatic artery patency following liver transplantation: Role in reducing frequency of hepatic artery arteriography: Eur Radiol, 2004; 14; 21-30
18. Brookmeyer CE, Bhatt S, Fishman EK, Sheth S, Multimodality imaging after liver transplant: Top 10 important complications: Radiographics, 2022; 42; 702-21
19. Moschouris H, Malagari K, Kalokairinou M, Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with intraarterial administration of SonoVue for guidance of transarterial chemoembolization: An initial experience: Med Ultrason, 2011; 13; 296-301
20. Lekht I, Nayyar M, Luu B, Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA CEUS) for localization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) supply during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE): A case series: Abdom Radiol (NY), 2017; 42; 1400-7
21. Bo J, Peng H, LianHua Z, Intraarterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict the short-term tumour response of hepatocellular carcinoma to Transarterial chemoembolization with Lipiodol: BMC Cancer, 2021; 21; 1171
22. Shiozawa K, Watanabe M, Ikehara T, Efficacy of intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasonography during transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma: World J Hepatol, 2018; 10; 95-104
23. Carrillo-Martínez M, Rodríguez-Montalvo C, Flores-Villaba E, Catheter directed hepatic artery thrombolysis following liver transplantation. Case report and review of the literature: BJR Case Rep, 2019; 5; 20190005
24. Astarcıoglu I, Egeli T, Gulcu A, Vascular complications after liver transplantation: Exp Clin Transplant, 2023; 21; 504-11
25. Volpin E, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Preservation of the arterial vascularisation after hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm following orthotopic liver transplantation: Long-term results: Ann Transplant, 2014; 19; 346-52
26. Minici R, Paone S, Talarico M, Percutaneous treatment of vascular access-site complications: A ten years’ experience in two centres: CVIR Endovasc, 2020; 3; 29
27. Güneyli S, Gök M, Çınar C, Imaging findings and endovascular management of iatrogenic hepatic arterial injuries: Diagn Interv Radiol, 2015; 21; 494-97
28. Fontanilla T, Noblejas A, Cortes C, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver lesions related to arterial thrombosis in adult liver transplantation: J Clin Ultrasound, 2013; 41; 493-500
Figures
Figure 1. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) for monitoring vascular patency of continuous thrombolysis. The patient was a 30-year-old man, 9 days after iver transplantation. (A) Color Doppler ultrasound showed well perfusion of the hepatic artery. (B) IA-CEUS showed perfusion of the hepatic artery. (C) Digital subtraction angiography showed partial perfusion of the hepatic artery.
Figure 2. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) diagnosis of intrahepatic biloma. A 50-year-old man developed hepatic artery thrombosis after hepatic artery balloon dilation, due to low hepatic artery flow 2 months after liver transplantation. (A) Two-dimensional ultrasound detected hypoechoic area in the liver. (B) Portal vein showed good perfusion, while the adjacent hepatic artery showed no perfusion on IA-CEUS. (C) IA-CEUS showed non-enhanced area in the liver, indicating a biloma. (D) The patient underwent emergency surgical resection of the lesion. (E) Postoperative pathology confirmed the biloma ().
Figure 3. Intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) showed a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm during thrombolysis monitoring. The patient was a 46-year-old man, 3 months after liver transplantation, who developed hepatic artery thrombosis after splenic artery embolization for splenic steal syndrome. (A) IA-CEUS showed a cystic structure adjacent to the hepatic artery. (B) IA-CEUS showed the catheter within it (). (C) Digital subtraction angiography confirmed the catheter displacement within the pseudoaneurysm. (D) Computed tomography angiography also confirmed the result. In Press
Original article
Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568
Original article
Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver TransplantationAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589
Database Analysis
Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289
Original article
Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 18,372
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 14,731
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 14,244
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 13,752
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588








