14 March 2003
Phenotypic Characterisation of Cellular Infiltrates in Endomyocardial Biopsies of Heart Transplant Recipients with Diagnosed Steroid Resistant Cellular rejection
Michal Zakliczynski, Helena Zakliczynska, Aleksandra Klimczak, Jerzy Nozynski, Katarzyna Kozlowska, Iwona Trzcinska, Roman Przybylski, Jacek Wojarski, Jacek Durmala, Andrzej Lange, Marian ZembalaAnn Transplant 2003; 8(1): 13-18 :: ID: 496873
Abstract
Objectives: Aim of this study was to find features characteristic for steroid resistant cellular rejection (SRR) of the transplanted heart, using phenotypic identification of cells creating infiltrates in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) obtained before and after high dose steroids treatment. Methods: 146 heart transplant recipients, treated with cyclosporine-A, azathioprine and prednisone, were taken under consideration. EMB results‡3A (ISHLT) were considered significant rejection, requiring treatment with 1g iv. methylprednizolone for 3 days followed by oral prednisone. SRR was diagnosed in case of increased grade of rejection in control EMB, lack of improvement in 2 consecutive EMBs or increasing hemodynamic compromise. SRR was found in 15 pts. (study group). Control group consisted of remaining 131 pts. Paraffin-embedded blocks containing EMB samples from 9 pts. from study group and randomly chosen14 pts. from control group were used (2 EMBs per pt.). Significant rejection was present in the first EMB, the second EMB was performed 7 days after beginning of the treatment. In the study group, first 2 EMBs creating a sequence of SRR were analysed. Following antigens were identified: CD45RO (T-cells), CD8 (cytotoxic T-cells), CD20 (B-cells), and CD95 (marker of apoptosis). DR expression and macrophages presence were also quantified. Results: CD45RO was predominant phenotype before and after treatment in both groups. Higher quantity of CD20 cells were observed in study group, however its number increased after treatment in control group. CD8-cells and macrophages were present in low amounts, that did not react to treatment. CD95 positive cells were present only in 3 EMBs. None of above differences was statistically significant. DR expression staining showed no difference either in biopsies taken before steroid treatment or after completing of high dose steroid therapy. Conclusion: Phenotype identification of cells infiltrating myocardium of the transplanted heart was not sufficient to predict or characterise steroid resistant rejection.
Keywords: Heart Transplantation, Steroid Resistant Acute Cellular Rejection, Endomyocardial Biopsy, Cellular Infiltrate, Lymphocytes Phenotyping
In Press
Original article
Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568
Original article
Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver TransplantationAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589
Database Analysis
Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289
Original article
Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 18,372
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 14,731
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 14,244
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 13,752
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588






