Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation

01 December 2007

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid: A comparison between enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients

T. van Gelde

Ann Transplant 2008; 13(1): 27-27 :: ID: 880181

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used in the field of solid organ transplantation. In combination with calcineurin inhibitors it has become the most often used drug to prevent acute rejection. In an attempt to reduce the incidence of the gastrointestinal adverse events associated with MMF use, the enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) was developed. Unfortunately, in two clinical trials EC-MPS 720 mg twice daily and MMF 1000 mg twice daily showed similar efficacy and safety profiles. The two formulations are therefore considered to be therapeutically equivalent. MPA exposure, measured as the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), does not differ during administration of bioequivalent dosages of the two drugs (720 mg EC-MPS and 1000 mg MMF). Also the pharmacodynamic effect, measured as inhibition of the target enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) has been shown to be comparable between the two formulations. However, due to the enteric coating the pharmacokinetic profile of EC-MPS is different, with a longer and more variable time to reach the peak concentration (T[sub]max[/sub]). This increased variability in pharmacokinetics impacts on the application of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients using EC-MPS. It is well known that the correlation between pre-dose concentrations and AUC is poor for MMF. At the same time we also realize that drawing full AUCs, consisting of 8-12 blood samples over the 12-hour dosing interval, poses practical problems in routine clinical practice. Therefore limited sampling strategies have successfully been developed, in order to reliably estimate AUC, using only 2 or 3 samples obtained in the first few hours after oral MMF intake. Such limited sampling strategies however require reproducible pharmacokinetic profiles. In contrast to MMF the profiles obtained with EC-MPS show too much variability to develop reliable limited sampling strategies. This implies that the only method to reliably measure the MPA-AUC in a patient treated with EC-MPS is to perform a full (8-12 blood sample) AUC curve.

Keywords: Mycophenolate Mofetil, Organ Transplantation, plasma concentration

0 Comments

In Press

04 Aug 2022 : Original article  

Long-Term Patency of All-in-One Sleeve Patch Graft Venoplasty in 16 Patients Who Underwent Living Donor Liv...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.936888  

22 Jul 2022 : Original article  

Diagnostic Role of Tumor Markers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplantation Candidates: An Analy...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.936937  

22 Jul 2022 : Original article  

Development of a Novel Model for Predicting Postoperative Short-Term Outcome in Patients with Hepatitis B-R...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.936732  

22 Jul 2022 : Original article  

Leucine-Rich Alpha-2-Glycoprotein (LRG-1) as a Potential Kidney Injury Marker in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.936751  

Most Viewed Current Articles

26 Jan 2022 : Review article  

Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Predictive Models

DOI :10.12659/AOT.934924

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e934924

29 Dec 2021 : Original article  

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588

24 Jul 2020 : Review article  

Kidney Transplantation in the Times of COVID-19 – A Literature Review

DOI :10.12659/AOT.925755

Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e925755

15 Mar 2022 : Case report  

Combined Liver, Pancreas-Duodenum, and Kidney Transplantation for Patients with Hepatitis B Cirrhosis, Urem...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.935860

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935860

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358
Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358