01 January 2008
Conversion from tacrolimus twice a day formulation to once-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients
D. Kamińska, M. Kuriata-Kordek, M. Boratyńska, K. Falkiewicz, M. KlingerAnn Transplant 2008; 13(1): 38-39 :: ID: 880200
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to assess pharmacokinetics of twice a day versus once-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Material/Methods: The study included 44 stable kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between 2001 and 2008. Among them were 21women and 23 men aged from 17 to 68 y. (45±13). Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in 28 cases, mycophenolate sodium in 6 cases, azathioprine in 3 cases and prednisone in 43 cases. Kidney allograft function was stable before conversion and eGFR were 50±16 ml/min. Patients were converted from twice a day tacrolimus to the same milligram-for-milligram daily dose of once-daily tacrolimus taken in the morning. Blood samples were collected just before and after 14 days of conversion. Tacrolimus trough levels in whole blood were assessed by the Abbott IMx system.
Results: The mean tacrolimus dose was 4.4±1.7 mg/day. The mean trough level before conversion was 6.9±1.9 ng/ml. After 14 days of conversion the mean through level was lower: 5.6±1.9 ng/ml (the decrease of 19%). After conversion 11 (25%) patients presented stable trough levels. Changes in tacrolimus concentration were observed in 33 (75%) patients. In 28 patients (64%) a decrease of trough level and in 5 patients (11%) an increase was noticed. The dose adjustment after conversion due to potential subtherapeutic levels was required in total of 16 (36%) patients. All the recipients presented stable allograft function during the observation period (>2 months) after conversion. Conclusions: The results provide evidence to support a safety 1:1 conversion from twice a day versus once-daily formulation of tacrolimus. Trough levels must be monitored carefully at the early post-conversion period since a dose adjustment may be required.
Keywords: Pharmacokinetics, immunosuppressive therapy, azathioprine
In Press
Original article
Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568
Original article
Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver TransplantationAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589
Database Analysis
Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289
Original article
Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 18,372
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 14,731
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 14,244
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 13,752
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588






