21 May 2009
Pre-transplant cellular alloreactivity is predictive of acute graft rejection and one-year graft function in kidney transplant recipients
K Kościelska-Kasprzak, D Drulis-Fajdasz, D Kamińska, O Mazanowska, M Krajewska, W Bieniecki, P Chudoba, W Polak, D Jańczak, D Patrzałek, M KlingerAnn Transplant 2009; 14(1): 22-22 :: ID: 880278
Abstract
In our study we investigated the cellular alloimmunity of kidney allograft recipients using direct interferon (IFN)-g enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT). Donor splenocytes PBMC of 53 recipients were obtained alongside kidney recovery. 11 recipients presented positive pre-transplant PRA values. For ELISPOT data analysis we calculated number, size and intensity of the spots, which reflected the volume of cytokine secretion at the single cell level. The results were recalculated as the ratios of the values observed for donor stimulated and unstimulated recipient cells and corrected for residual donor activity. Significantly higher pre-transplant donor stimulated activity was observed for the recipients who underwent AR episode within one year after Tx (p<0.05). The mean change in the spot number, size and intensity observed for rejectors vs. nonrejectors were 0.99 vs. 3.33, 1.6 vs. 6.05, and 1.4 vs. 6.31, respectively. The assessed parameters were prognostic of high AR risk - 1.5-fold increase in spot number (AR incidence 9% vs. 52%), 2.0-fold increase in size (AR incidence 11% vs. 44%), and 2.7-fold increase in intensity (AR incidence 9% vs. 52%). The three parameters analyzed were correlated with the one year serum creatinine concentration (p<0.05). From 14 AR positive recipients, 11 could have been predicted with pre-transplant ELISPOT measures, while only 2 based upon PRA values. Our data show that the ELISPOT determined volume of donor induced activity observed for the recipient cells obtained just before Tx is predictive of the risk of graft rejection and one-year term graft function.
Keywords: Kidney Transplantation
In Press
Original article
Fundamental Strategies and Technical Perspectives in Bile Duct Anastomosis for Living Donor Liver Transplan...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.953761
Clinical Research
Retrospective Study of Implementation and Outcomes of a Non-Cryopreserved Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cel...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.954230
Clinical Research
Prognostic Prediction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Recipients With Complete Pathological Response ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.954574
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 21,978
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 18,247
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 16,856
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 16,762
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604






