30 June 2011
Limitations of Rituximab/IVIg desensitization protocol in kidney transplantation; Is this better than a tincture of time?
Tomasz KozlowskiABCDEF, Kenneth A. AndreoniCDEFAnn Transplant 2011; 16(2): 19-25 :: ID: 881860
Abstract
Background: A plasmapheresis-free protocol for desensitization of donor kidney transplant candidates with high Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (CPRA) was initiated at our center. The protocol was adopted from previously published work by Vo, Jordan et al.
Material/Methods: Five patients with CPRA of 94±18%, awaiting kidney transplant from living or deceased donors received rituximab (1 g × 2 doses) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG 2 g/kg × 2 doses) without plasmapheresis. Levels of donor specific antibodies (DSA) and T/B cell crossmatches were followed using solid phase flow cytometry.
Results: Three out of 5 patients were sensitized only to Class II HLA antigens. All patients had very high levels of alloantibodies before initiation of the treatment. All of the candidates initially demonstrated reduced levels of HLA antibody, but statistical significance was only obtained in one patient Class II antibody and in another only for Class I. Depletion was transient with observed antibody rebound. Rituximab effectively depleted CD20 cells in peripheral blood. None of the patients were transplanted due to persistently high levels of antibody and strong positive flow cytometry crossmatches. Under this protocol, reduction of HLA antibodies in patients with high levels was insufficient.
Conclusions: Highly allo-sensitized patients with a CPRA above 85% may not benefit from a combination of rituximab-IVIG alone. The previously published protocol does not help all patients achieve an acceptable crossmatch. An individualized approach to the treatment of highly sensitized patients is still required.
Keywords: limitations of desensitization, Kidney, Transplantation, rituximab, IVIG
In Press
Original article
Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568
Original article
Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver TransplantationAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589
Database Analysis
Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289
Original article
Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 18,372
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 14,731
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 14,244
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 13,752
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588






