30 December 2011
Immunosuppressive regimens containing generic mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax) in de novo renal transplant recipients – preliminary results of 6-month observation
Bolesław RutkowskiACDE, Beata BzomaBCEF, Alicja Dębska-ŚlizieńABCDE, Andrzej ChamieniaBDEAnn Transplant 2011; 16(4): 74-80 :: ID: 882222
Abstract
Background: The aim of the findings presented below is to show the preliminary outcomes of transplantation in patients treated with the generic formulation of mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax, Teva).
Material/Methods: Over the past 2 years 34 patients received generic mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax) after renal transplantation at the Gdansk Transplantology Center. During the same time period another 127 kidney transplantations were performed in our Department and these patients were treated with other formulations of mycophenolate (CellCept, Myfortic or Mycophenolate mofetil Apotex) as a part of the immunosuppressive scheme. Fifteen of the Myfenax patients received a pair of kidneys from the same donor and received original mycophenolate mofetil Cell-Cept.
Results: The outcomes of the renal transplants in both groups (Myfenax vs. pair) were good; with satisfactory function of grafts, and no instances of graft loss were reported. There was no difference in the incidence of acute renal graft rejection (AR) in either group. Moderate adverse reactions to immunosupression were observed in both groups.
On the other hand, a comparison between the 34 patients with Myfenax and the 127 other patients with other formulations of mycophenolate revealed no differences in the incidence of AR, delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss and death.
Conclusions: There were no differences in the incidence of AR, DGF, graft loss and death in patients with Myfenax vs. original CellCept and other formulations of mycophenolate.
In order to confirm its complete biological and pharmacokinetic equivalence with the reference medicine, long-term, randomized observations carried out on larger renal transplant patients groups are needed.
Keywords: immunosupressive therapy, kidney tranplantation, mycophenolate
In Press
Case report
Tongue Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients After Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Case SeriesAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951715
Original article
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hepatic Steatosis in Kidney Transplant RecipientsAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.952251
Original article
The Anatomical Landscape of Living Donor Livers: A 101-Case Retrospective Single-Center Study in Indonesia ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.952031
Original article
Decreased Ventilation Duration and ICU Stay Associated With Early Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Af...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.953143
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 20,545
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 16,641
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 15,898
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 15,796
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988






