31 March 2012
Pharmacokinetic monitoring of mycophenolic acid in heart transplant patients: Correlation the side-effects and rejections with pharmacokinetic parameters
Michał J. FigurskiCE, Tomasz PawińskiAEF, Lee R. GoldbergA, David DeNofrioD, Artur NawrockiC, David O. TaylorB, Kathleen D. LakeB, Donna ChojnowskiB, Leslie M. ShawADEFDOI: 10.12659/AOT.882638
Ann Transplant 2012; 17(1): 68-78
Abstract
Background: Mycophenolate mofetil is a commonly used immunosuppressant in heart transplantation but pharmacokinetic monitoring is not routinely done. We performed a prospective pilot multi-center trial in de-novo heart transplant recipients to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) at multiple time points in the first year following transplant.
Material/Methods: MPA trough and estimated area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were obtained at multiple visits from 21 enrolled patients. We attempted to correlate the side-effects and rejections with PK parameters.
Results: MPA AUC and trough levels increased modestly over 12 months with substantial inter and intra patient variability. Cardiac rejection was associated with low MPA AUC values with a threshold of <36.2 mg×h/L during the first two post-transplant weeks. A threshold of 2-weeks average MPA trough level of 1.43 mg/L provided a sensitivity 82% and a specificity of 60%.
Conclusions: Adequate MPA levels are associated with decreased risk of allograft rejection. For patients with Cyclosporine co-immunosuppression, we propose an MPA trough of 1.4 mg/L and an MPA AUC of 36 mg × h/L as threshold values for dose adjustments. We recommend monitoring MPA levels at 1, 2 and 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and whenever an unexplained side-effect or allograft rejection occurs. Additional MPA AUC measurements are recommended when trough levels do not explain the clinical picture.
Keywords: Heart Transplant, Pharmacokinetics, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Rejection, clinical outcome, therapeutic drug monitoring
In Press
Case report
Tongue Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients After Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Case SeriesAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951715
Original article
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hepatic Steatosis in Kidney Transplant RecipientsAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.952251
Original article
The Anatomical Landscape of Living Donor Livers: A 101-Case Retrospective Single-Center Study in Indonesia ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.952031
Original article
Decreased Ventilation Duration and ICU Stay Associated With Early Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Af...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.953143
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 20,545
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 16,641
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 15,898
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 15,796
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988






