31 December 2012
Cost analysis of kidney transplantation in highly sensitized recipients compared to intermittent maintenance hemodialysis
Ahmed Al-JedaiABCDEF, Mohammed AlsultanABE, Khalid AlmeshariADE, Khalid AlshaibaniAE, Hazem ElgamalBE, Delal AlkortasCE, Fowad KhurshidCE, Mai AltalhiBE, Khaled HamawiABCDEDOI: 10.12659/AOT.883698
Ann Transplant 2012; 17(4): 82-91
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplantation in allosensitized recipients has recently increased. Studies performing cost analysis of desensitization protocols are scarce.
Material/Methods: We performed an actual cost comparison between kidney transplantation following desensitization and maintenance hemodialysis. Group A (n=35) consisted of allosensitized recipients who underwent desensitization using immunoadsorption and/or plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and anti-CD20 antibody who were followed for ≥ 2 years. Group B (n=49) consisted of matched patients who remained on hemodialysis throughout the study period. Actual costs of donor care, surgical procedures, out-patient visits, in-hospital admissions, medications, hemodialysis, immunoadsorption, plasmapheresis, and laboratory and radiology investigations were calculated. Health care services were provided by a single institution.
Results: Mortality rate was similar between both groups. The average 4-year actual total cost was $210,779 in group A and $317,186.3 in group B; respectively (p=0.017). Average total cost per patient in group A was $186,608; $14,233; $5,536; $4,402 in the first, second, third and fourth years after transplantation respectively while the average total annual cost per patient in group B was $79,296. The total cost in both groups became equal by month 31. The predicted annual cost savings in group A after 31 months was $33,943.
Conclusions: Despite using costly desensitization protocols, kidney transplantation in sensitized patients provides long-term cost savings compared to maintenance hemodialysis.
Keywords: cost analysis, allosensitization, desensitization, financial analysis, positive cross-match kidney transplantation
926 165
In Press
14 Sep 2023 : Case report
Intrahepatic Venous Collateral Circulation and Reverse Blood Flow After Main Hepatic Vein Obstruction: A Ca...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.941521
12 Sep 2023 : Original article
Three-Dimensional Printing of Polycaprolactone/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds with a Pore Size of ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.940365
04 Sep 2023 : Original article
Analysis of Anxiety and Influencing Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients and General Public During the C...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.941489
04 Sep 2023 : Original article
Prolonged Tracheal Intubation in the ICU as a Possible Risk Factor for Arytenoid Dislocation After Liver Tr...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.940727
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
26 Jan 2022 : Review article
Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Predictive ModelsDOI :10.12659/AOT.934924
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e934924
29 Dec 2021 : Original article
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588
15 Mar 2022 : Case report
Combined Liver, Pancreas-Duodenum, and Kidney Transplantation for Patients with Hepatitis B Cirrhosis, Urem...DOI :10.12659/AOT.935860
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935860