10 January 2013
High graft protection and low incidences of infections, malignancies and other adverse effects with intra-operative high dose ATG-induction: A single centre cohort study of 760 cases
Jürgen KadenABDEFG, Andreas VölpCDE, Claus WesslauBDEFDOI: 10.12659/AOT.883792
Ann Transplant 2013; 18:9-22
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 1990 we introduced the intra-operative single high-dose induction (HDI) with ATG-Fresenius as a novel renal sparing concept. The aim of this analysis was to compare both the long-term patient and graft survival and the incidences of adverse effects in recipients treated with standard triple-drug therapy (TDT) alone or with an additional HDI with ATG-F.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 760 renal transplant recipients receiving either TDT, consisting of steroids, azathioprine and cyclosporine (n=238) or TDT + 9mg/kg ATG-F intra-operatively (n=522) were included in this retrospective analysis.
RESULTS: Compared to the TDT cohort the graft and patient survival over the entire ten year period was significantly prolonged in the TDT+HDI cohort. In contrast, main adverse effects (TDT+HDI vs. TDT) such as malignancies (4.4 vs. 2.1%), PTLD (0.4 vs. 0.4%), CMV diseases (18.6 vs. 15.5%), Herpes zoster infections (2.9 vs. 1.3%), bacterial pneumonias (3.1 vs. 1.3%) and post-operative thrombocytopenia <50×10³/µl (0.5 vs. 1.3%) did not significantly differ between the two immunosuppressive regimens. Only CMV-IgM seroconversions occurred significantly more in the HDI cohort (39.3 vs. 23.5%). The absolute numbers of CD3, CD4 and CD8 cell counts were significantly reduced in TDT+ATG-F HDI cohort only over a time period of about five days.
CONCLUSIONS: This world-wide largest single-centre cohort analysis clearly shows the superiority of the HDI with ATG-F compared to TDT alone in improving long-term graft survival without increasing the risk for infections, malignancies or other adverse effects.
Keywords: ATG Fresenius, Kidney Transplantation, Antilymphocyte globulins, ATG induction, patient survival, Graft Survival, adverse effects
678 22
In Press
06 Jun 2023 : Original article
A 15-Year Retrospective Study of Supportive Extracorporeal Therapies Including Plasma Exchange and Continuo...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.939745
02 Jun 2023 : Original article
Survival analysis of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy under different diagnostic criteria a...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.939890
10 May 2023 : Original article
Incidence of Thromboembolic Complications Following Kidney Transplantation with Short and Extended Aspirin ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.939143
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
26 Jan 2022 : Review article
Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Predictive ModelsDOI :10.12659/AOT.934924
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e934924
29 Dec 2021 : Original article
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588
15 Mar 2022 : Case report
Combined Liver, Pancreas-Duodenum, and Kidney Transplantation for Patients with Hepatitis B Cirrhosis, Urem...DOI :10.12659/AOT.935860
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935860