05 January 2016 : Original article
Multinational Evaluation of Mycophenolic Acid, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporin, Sirolimus, and Everolimus Utilization
Kyle M. GardinerABCDEF, Susan E. TettACDEF, Christine E. StaatzACDEFDOI: 10.12659/AOT.895664
Ann Transplant 2016; 21:1-11
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing immunosuppressant utilization and expenditure is a worldwide challenge as more people successfully live with transplanted organs. Our aims were to characterize utilization of mycophenolate, tacrolimus, cyclosporin, sirolimus, and everolimus in Australian transplant recipients from 2007 to 2013; to identify specific patterns of usage; and to compare Australian utilization with Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, and the Netherlands use.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Australian utilization and expenditure data were captured through national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Highly Specialized Drug administrative databases. Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, and the Netherlands utilization were retrieved from their healthcare databases. Utilization was compared as defined daily dose per 1000 population per day (DDD/1000 population/day). Data on kidney transplant recipients, the predominant patient group prescribed these medicines, were obtained from international transplant registries.
RESULTS: From 2007–2013 Australian utilization of mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and everolimus increased 2.7-fold, 2.2-fold, and 2.3-fold, respectively. Use of cyclosporin and sirolimus decreased 20% and 30%, respectively. Australian utilization was significantly lower than European utilization (2013) but was increasing at a faster rate. Total Australian expenditure increased approximately AUD$30 million over the study period to almost AUD$100 million in 2013. Kidney transplantation rates increased across each country over this time, with Australia having the lowest rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressant usage and subsequent expenditure are rising in Australia and Northern Europe. With increased numbers of people living with transplants, and the observed growth potential predicted from Northern European data, this class of medicines can be expected to continue consuming an increasing share of Australian pharmaceutical expenditure into the future.
Keywords: Drug Utilization, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kidney Transplantation, Pharmacoepidemiology
In Press
Case report
Tongue Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients After Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Case SeriesAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951715
Original article
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hepatic Steatosis in Kidney Transplant RecipientsAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.952251
Original article
The Anatomical Landscape of Living Donor Livers: A 101-Case Retrospective Single-Center Study in Indonesia ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.952031
Original article
Decreased Ventilation Duration and ICU Stay Associated With Early Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Af...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.953143
Most Viewed Current Articles
24 Aug 2021 : Review article 20,545
Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future PerspectivesDOI :10.12659/AOT.931664
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664
29 Dec 2021 : Original article 16,641
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588
Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588
05 Apr 2022 : Original article 15,898
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
22 Nov 2022 : Original article 15,796
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988