Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation

27 August 2024: Original Paper  

Early Post-Transplant Serum Ferritin Levels as Predictive Biomarkers for Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation for Acute Leukemia

Zhiqi Zhang1ABCDEF, Bohan Li1ABCDEF, Lu Liu2ABCDEF, Ruolan Xiong1BCDE, Senlin Zhang3ABC, Minyuan Liu1ABC, Zihao Xia1BCE, Shuran Wang1BCE, Jie Li1CDEFG, Shaoyan Hu14ABCDEFG*

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.944156

Ann Transplant 2024; 29:e944156

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) using umbilical cord blood is a valuable therapy option for patients with acute leukemia (AL). Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains the most frequently encountered complication. This study investigated risk factors for aGVHD and assessed whether post-transplant serum ferritin (SF) within 2 weeks is a potential biomarker for aGVHD in pediatric patients with AL undergoing umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 71 patients with AL who underwent UCBT at the Children’s Hospital of Soochow University between 2017 and 2022. We evaluated several factors related to aGVHD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the proportional subdistribution hazard regression model of Fine and Gray. Analyses of overall survival (OS) were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS: Of the 71 patients, 23 (32.4%) experienced grade II-IV aGVHD, of whom 18 (25.4%) developed grade III-IV aGVHD. Patients with grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD had worse 5-year OS (69.4±10%, p=0.01; and 60.6±11.6, P=0.007, respectively). Conditioning intensity was a risk factor for grade III-IV aGVHD (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.89, P=0.027). An SF level >1650 ng/mL within 2 weeks post-transplant was associated with an increased risk of severe aGVHD (HR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.09-11.97, P=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant SF within 2 weeks was a potential biomarker for developing severe aGVHD. Higher levels of post-transplant SF are associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD and grade III-IV aGVHD.

Keywords: Hospitals, Pediatric, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Graft vs Host Disease, Ferritins

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a valuable therapy option for patients with acute leukemia (AL). Umbilical cord blood, as a conveniently available donor source with low immunogenicity and less stringent human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matching requirements, has emerged as an alternative donor source because of the scarcity of HLA-matched related donors [1,2]. Although the outcomes of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) have considerably improved, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains the most common and potentially life-threatening complication [3,4]. The risk factors for aGVHD and outcomes of aGVHD in adults using conventional donor sources are well documented. HLA matching, sex disparity between the donor and recipient, conditioning intensity, increased age, multiparous female donors, ineffective aGVHD prophylaxis, graft source, gut bacterial diversity, and total body irradiation have been implicated as risk factors for the onset of aGVHD [5–10]. However, little is known about risk factors for aGVHD after UCBT in children, and it is unclear whether the risk factors and outcomes are similar to those of conventional donor sources in adults.

Patients undergoing allo-HSCT are often transfused with multiple units of blood products, which can result in iron overload. Serum ferritin (SF) is an acute-phase reactant protein which can become elevated in response to iron overload. SF levels have been shown to correlate with long-term outcomes. According to a meta-analysis of 25 trials involving 4545 patients, a high pretransplant SF level was associated with worse overall survival (OS) [11]. Elevated post-transplant SF levels have also been linked to increased non-relapse mortality and lower OS [12–14]. Furthermore, Lin et al [15] demonstrated that increased pretransplant SF levels are linked to a higher incidence of grade II–IV aGVHD and grade III–IV aGVHD in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). However, the relationship between post-transplant SF and aGVHD in children with AL after UCBT is yet to be clarified.

Therefore, we performed a retrospective study at our center to analyze the outcomes of aGVHD and possible risk factors in pediatric patients with AL after UCBT. The purpose was to identify risk factors for aGVHD to improve the quality of life after UCBT in children with AL.

Material and Methods

PATIENTS:

This study included children aged 1–18 years diagnosed with AL who underwent UCBT at Children’s Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China, from 2017 to 2022. The patients’ parents and stem cell donors provided written informed consent before beginning the transplantation process. The patient selection criteria were as follows: (i) diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MAL); (ii) aged 0–18 years at the time of transplantation; (iii) received a single-unit of cord blood; (iv) no prior allo-HSCT; and (v) neutrophils were successfully engrafted.

SUPPORTIVE CARE:

Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) were used in combination with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis. All patients were given routine supportive treatment, including antiviral (acyclovir) prophylaxis for herpes simplex virus-positive recipients, preemptive cytomegalovirus prophylaxis, and antifungal prophylaxis.

DEFINITIONS:

AGVHD was diagnosed and graded according to previously published consensus guidelines [16]. OS considered death from any cause as the event, and surviving patients were censored at the date of last contact. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as an absolute neutrophil count ≥0.5×109/L for ≥3 days. Platelet engraftment was defined as platelet count ≥20×109/L without transfusion support for ≥7 days.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

To compare differences between groups, the chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to assess the statistical significance of differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively, between groups. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using Gray’s test and the Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazards regression model. Death before day 180 without severe aGVHD was considered a competing event. Variables with P<0.10 were included in the multivariable model. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared using log-rank tests. The statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software (version 4.3.1; RStudio Team, Boston, MA, USA; URL: http://www.rstudio.com/).

Results

OUTCOMES OF ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE:

We compared the OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) of the patients between groups of different grades of aGVHD. This study did not find a statistically significant difference in the OS and RFS of patients with grade I–IV aGVHD (Figure 1). However, patients with grade II–IV or grade III–IV aGVHD had worse OS (Figures 2 and 3, 69.4±10%, P=0.01 and 60.6± 11.6%, P=0.007, respectively).

CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH GRADE 0-II AND III–IV ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE:

The patients were divided into 2 groups: grade 0-II and grade III–IV aGVHD. The characteristics of patients in each group are shown in Table 1. The grade 0-II aGVHD group included 53 patients (27 boys and 26 girls) with a median age of 3.58 years (range: 0.67–12.57 years). There were 30 patients with AML and 23 patients with ALL. The median doses of mononuclear cells (MNC) and CD34+ cells were 6.20×107/kg (range: 1.30–11.33×107/kg) and 2.73×105/kg (range: 1.70–6.41×105/kg), respectively. The grade II–IV aGVHD group included 18 patients (8 boys and 10 girls) with a median age of 3.98 years (range: 1.42–8.83 years), 8 with AML, 8 with ALL, and 2 with MAL. The median doses of MNC and CD34+ cells were 5.90×107/kg (range: 1.37–11.79×107/kg) and 2.78×105/kg (range: 0.83–9.20×105/kg), respectively.

RISK FACTORS FOR GRADE III–IV ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE:

We assessed several other variables for a potential association with an increased risk of III–IV aGVHD using univariate analysis, including age, sex, disease, HLA matching, ABO matching, disease status at transplant, conditioning intensity, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), conditioning drug dose, neutrophil engraftment time, platelet engraftment time, MNC, CD34+, post-transplant SF within 2 weeks (all before aGVHD occurred), and pretransplant SF (Table 2). HLA matching (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.18–1.14, P=0.093), conditioning intensity (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13–0.81, P=0.017), and SF level within 2 weeks post-transplant (HR: 3.98, 95% CI: 1.16–13.60, P=0.028) were associated with an elevated risk of developing III–IV aGVHD. Furthermore, conditioning intensity (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13–0.89, P=0.027) and SF level within 2 weeks post-transplant (HR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.09–11.97, P=0.036) were independent risk factors for severe aGVHD in the multivariable analysis.

ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE AFTER UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD TRANSPLANTATION:

Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis, of whom 37 were in the aGVHD group (14 with grade I aGVHD, 5 with grade II aGVHD, 3 with grade III aGVHD, and 15 with grade IV aGVHD). The sites involved included the skin (31 patients), intestines (22 patients), and liver (10 patients). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their SF level (Table 3).

INCIDENCE OF ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE:

The incidence of grade II–IV was 44.4% in patients with an SF level >1650 ng/mL, as opposed to 14.3% in patients with an SF level <1650 ng/mL, representing a statistically significant difference (P=0.011). Similarly, for grade III–IV aGVHD, the incidence was 35.4% in patients with an SF level >1650 ng/mL and 10.7% in patients with an SF level <1650 ng/mL (P=0.024) (Figure 4).

OUTCOMES ACCORDING TO SERUM FERRITIN LEVELS:

Finally, we compared the OS and RFS of patients in the SF level <1650 ng/mL and >1650 ng/mL groups. OS and RFS were not associated with the SF level (Figure 5, P=0.15 and P=0.058, respectively).

Discussion

This study assessed the prognosis of children with aGVHD after UCBT and identified risk factors for the development of grades III–IV aGVHD. In recent years, an increasing number of children with AL have undergone UCBT. Despite significant developments in UCBT, aGVDH remains a crucial factor restricting quality of life, especially in patients with severe aGVHD. Patients with grade II–IV and III–IV aGVHD had worse 5-year OS. Infection is the cause of death in most patients with aGVHD, which may have been exacerbated by more aggressive immunosuppressive strategies. Consequently, it is critical to understand the risk factors for aGVHD.

Several risk factors for aGVHD in patients undergoing UCBT, such as myeloablative conditioning, omission of ATG, and double umbilical cord blood, have been described previously [10,17–19]. In this study, we similarly found that conditioning intensity was an independent risk factor for III–IV aGVHD. We also identified the post-transplant SF level as a risk factor for severe aGVDH in the univariate and multivariable analysis.

Previous studies have found that the maximum post-transplant SF levels were significantly higher in patients during aGVHD after allo-HSCT [20]. However, it remains unclear whether post-transplant SF is associated with the occurrence of aGVHD after UCBT in children with AL. We found the post-transplant SF level within 2 weeks was a potential biomarker for predicting development of severe aGVHD. The SF level was also associated with the incidence of II–IV and III–IV aGVHD.

There are multiple potential causes of hyperferritinemia in patients undergoing UCBT. Brissot et al [21] reported that hyperferritinemia can be caused by inflammation, metabolic syndrome, hepatitis, and alcoholism. Iron overload can also induce hyperferritinemia after allo-HSCT, which may be related to transfusions, dyserythropoiesis, or associated genetic factors, and has been reported as a risk factor for aGVHD [22].

Ferritin can have an impact on effects of antigen presenting cells [23]. The activation of antigen-presenting cells is the main mechanism of aGVDH pathogenesis. Furthermore, ferritin enhances the susceptibility to aGVHD by organ toxicity due to reactive oxygen species [24]. Several in vivo studies have demonstrated that mitigating iron overload could potentially reduce the incidence of aGVHD [25,26].

In a retrospective analysis, Lin et al [15] found that pretransplant SF levels were a risk factor for aGVHD in patients with SAA after allo-HSCT. However, we found that the pretransplant SF level was not an independent predictor of aGVHD after UCBT in children with AL. This may be due to the absence of the need for repeated transfusions in patients with AL compared with patients with SAA before UCBT, which may result in no obvious elevation of pretransplant SF. Several studies have shown that post-transplant SF can be used to predict survival outcomes [12–14,27]. Nevertheless, the 5-year OS and RFS did not differ significantly according to the SF level in our analysis. This may be attributable to the limited sample size.

This study has some limitations, including the retrospective design and limited number of patients included in the analysis. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to confirm the risk factors for aGVHD after UCBT in children with AL.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the post-transplant SF level within 2 weeks was a potential biomarker for developing severe aGVHD. Higher levels of post-transplant SF are associated with a higher incidence of grade II–IV aGVHD and grade III–IV aGVHD. However, these results need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Figures

Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade I–IV aGVHD vs no (grade 0) aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade I–IV aGVHD vs no (grade 0) aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 1. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade I–IV aGVHD vs no (grade 0) aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade I–IV aGVHD vs no (grade 0) aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft). Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade II–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-I aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade II–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-I aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 2. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade II–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-I aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade II–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-I aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft). Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade III–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-II aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade III–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-II aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 3. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade III–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-II aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade III–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-II aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft). (A, B) Cumulative incidence of grades II–IV and III–IV aGVHD in patients with a serum ferritin level >1650 ng/mL and <1650 ng/mL. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 4. (A, B) Cumulative incidence of grades II–IV and III–IV aGVHD in patients with a serum ferritin level >1650 ng/mL and <1650 ng/mL. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft). (A, B) Overall survival and relapse-free survival of patients with serum ferritin levels <1650 ng/mL and >1650 ng/mL. OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 5. (A, B) Overall survival and relapse-free survival of patients with serum ferritin levels <1650 ng/mL and >1650 ng/mL. OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).

References

1. Gupta A, Cord-blood transplantation in patients with minimal residual disease: N Engl J Med, 2016; 375(22); 2203-4

2. Kindwall-Keller TL, Ballen KK, Umbilical cord blood: The promise and the uncertainty: Stem Cells Transl Med, 2020; 9(10); 1153-62

3. Sugita J, Atsuta Y, Nakamae H, Comparable survival outcomes with haploidentical stem cell transplantation and cord blood transplantation: Bone Marrow Transplant, 2022; 57(11); 1681-88

4. Kanda J, Umeda K, Kato K, Effect of graft-versus-host disease on outcomes after pediatric single cord blood transplantation: Bone Marrow Transplant, 2020; 55(7); 1430-37

5. Jagasia M, Arora M, Flowers ME, Risk factors for acute GVHD and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation: Blood, 2012; 119(1); 296-307

6. Tie R, Zhang T, Yang B, Clinical implications of HLA locus mismatching in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: A meta-analysis: Oncotarget, 2017; 8(16); 27645-60

7. Wang Y, Chang YJ, Xu LP, Who is the best donor for a related HLA haplotype-mismatched transplant?: Blood, 2014; 124(6); 843-50

8. Wang Y, Wu DP, Liu QF, Donor and recipient age, gender and ABO incompatibility regardless of donor source: Validated criteria for donor selection for haematopoietic transplants: Leukemia, 2018; 32(2); 492-98

9. Lai YR, Chen YH, Hu DM, Multicenter phase II study of a combination of cyclosporine a, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis: results of the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplant Cooperative Group (CBMTCG): J Hematol Oncol, 2014; 7; 59

10. MacMillan ML, Weisdorf DJ, Brunstein CG, Acute graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation: analysis of risk factors: Blood, 2009; 113(11); 2410-15

11. Yan Z, Chen X, Wang H, Effect of pre-transplantation serum ferritin on outcomes in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A meta-analysis: Medicine (Baltimore), 2018; 97(27); e10310

12. Meyer SC, O’Meara A, Buser AS, Prognostic impact of posttransplantation iron overload after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2013; 19(3); 440-44

13. Wermke M, Schmidt A, Middeke JM, MRI-based liver iron content predicts for nonrelapse mortality in MDS and AML patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Clin Cancer Res, 2012; 18(23); 6460-68

14. Pan T, Ji Y, Liu H, Impact of iron overload and iron chelation with deferasirox on outcomes of patients with severe aplastic anemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Transplant Cell Ther, 2023; 29(8); 507e1-e8

15. Lin F, Zuo Y, Zhang Y, The impact of pretransplant serum ferritin on haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant for acquired severe aplastic anemia in children and adolescents: Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2022; 69(9); e29845

16. Schoemans HM, Lee SJ, Ferrara JL, EBMT-NIH-CIBMTR Task Force position statement on standardized terminology & guidance for graft-versus-host disease assessment: Bone Marrow Transplant, 2018; 53(11); 1401-15

17. Lazaryan A, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor T, Risk factors for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with umbilical cord blood and matched sibling donors: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2016; 22(1); 134-40

18. Chen YB, Wang T, Hemmer MT, GvHD after umbilical cord blood transplantation for acute leukemia: An analysis of risk factors and effect on outcomes: Bone Marrow Transplant, 2017; 52(3); 400-8

19. ElGohary G, El Fakih R, de Latour R, Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aplastic anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcome on behalf of the severe aplastic anemia working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation (SAAWP of EBMT): Bone Marrow Transplant, 2020; 55(10); 1906-17

20. Nogai A, Shi Y, Pérez-Hernandez D, Organ siderosis and hemophagocytosis during acute graft-versus-host disease: Haematologica, 2016; 101(8); e344-46

21. Brissot E, Savani BN, Mohty M, Management of high ferritin in long-term survivors after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Semin Hematol, 2012; 49(1); 35-42

22. Lee SE, Yahng SA, Cho BS, Impact of pretransplant red cell transfusion on outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with severe aplastic anemia: Bone Marrow Transplant, 2016; 51(10); 1323-29

23. Qu Z, Guo Y, Li M, Recombinant ferritin nanoparticles can induce dendritic cell maturation through TLR4/NF-κB pathway: Biotechnol Lett, 2020; 42(12); 2489-500

24. Kim CH, Leitch HA, Iron overload-induced oxidative stress in myelodysplastic syndromes and its cellular sequelae: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2021; 163; 103367

25. Bair S, Spaulding E, Parkkinen J, Transplantation of allogeneic T cells alters iron homeostasis in NOD/SCID mice: Blood, 2009; 113(8); 1841-44

26. Gerbitz A, Ewing P, Wilke A, Induction of heme oxygenase-1 before conditioning results in improved survival and reduced graft-versus-host disease after experimental allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2004; 10(7); 461-72

27. Fingrut W, Law A, Lam W, Post-transplant ferritin level predicts outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, independent from pre-transplant ferritin level: Ann Hematol, 2021; 100(3); 789-98

Figures

Figure 1. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade I–IV aGVHD vs no (grade 0) aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade I–IV aGVHD vs no (grade 0) aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 2. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade II–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-I aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade II–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-I aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 3. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). (A) OS in patients with grade III–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-II aGVHD; (B) RFS in patients with grade III–IV aGVHD vs grade 0-II aGVHD. aGHVD – acute graft-versus-host disease; OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 4. (A, B) Cumulative incidence of grades II–IV and III–IV aGVHD in patients with a serum ferritin level >1650 ng/mL and <1650 ng/mL. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).Figure 5. (A, B) Overall survival and relapse-free survival of patients with serum ferritin levels <1650 ng/mL and >1650 ng/mL. OS – overall survival; RFS – relapse-free survival. Software used for the creation of the figure: RStudio (version 4.3.1, Microsoft).

In Press

Original article  

Impact of Donor-Recipient Relationship on Long-Term Outcomes in Living-Related Donor Kidney Transplantation

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.945065  

Original article  

Urinary Chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 Are Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Kidney Transplant Rejection

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.944762  

Original article  

Risk Factors for Graft Failure After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Eastern China from 2018 to 2021

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.945388  

Original article  

Predictive Model for Post-Transplant Renal Fibrosis Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.945699  

Most Viewed Current Articles

05 Apr 2022 : Original article   12,955

Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

DOI :10.12659/AOT.935604

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604

22 Nov 2022 : Original article   10,017

Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988

12 Jan 2022 : Original article   9,368

Risk Factors for Developing BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of ...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.934738

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e934738

15 Mar 2022 : Case report   7,140

Combined Liver, Pancreas-Duodenum, and Kidney Transplantation for Patients with Hepatitis B Cirrhosis, Urem...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.935860

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935860

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358
Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358